SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Siddaiah vs The State Of Karnataka By on 26 April, 2017

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF APRIL, 2017

BEFORE

THE HON’ BLE MRS JUSTICE RATHNAKALA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1896 OF 2017

BETWEEN:

1. SIDDAIAH
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

2. JAYAMMA
W/O LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS

3. K.S.MAHESH
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS

4. K.S.NAGARAJU
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

5. K.S.VAJRESH
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

6. K.S.PRABHU
S/O LATE SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

ALL ARE R/AT KAMANAHALLY VILLAGE
2

KASABA HOBLI
K.R.PET TALUK
MANDYA DISTRICT.
… PETITIONERS

(BY SRI BHYRESH V., ADV., FOR
SRI KEMPARAJU, ADV.,)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY K.R.PET RURAL POLICE STATION
REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT COMPLEX
BANGALORE-560 001.
… RESPONDENT

(BY SRI B.J.ESHWARAPPA, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438
OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL
IN THE EVENT OF THEIR ARREST IN CR.NO.21/2017 OF K.R.PET
RURAL POLICE STATION, MANDYA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S
498(A), 504, 306, 143 R/W 149 OF IPC.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-

State.

The respondent-Police have registered the FIR in their

Crime No.21/2017 against seven accused persons in respect

of offences punishable under Sections 498A, 504, 306, 143

read with Section 149 of IPC. The petitioners are arrayed as

accused Nos.2 to 7 and they are the family members of 1st

accused.

2. The allegation of the prosecution is, the deceased was

married to 1st accused for last 10 years. The accused persons

used to abuse her verbally and thus, inflicted mental cruelty.

On 15.1.2017, the deceased committed suicide by setting

herself ablaze and she died while on treatment in the

hospital. She has stated with her brother/complainant that

since the accused persons pin-pricked her and insisted her to
4

return to her parental amount and get money from her

parents, she has committed suicide. 1st accused is granted

anticipatory bail by the order of this Court in

Crl.P.No.2654/2017 dated 25.4.2017.

3. Having regard to the nature of allegation, there is no

impediment to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners for a

limited period.

4. Accordingly, petition is allowed. Petitioners are

granted anticipatory bail in Crime No.21/2017 registered by

the respondent-Police for a limited period of three weeks.

Within the above period, they shall surrender before the

concerned Court and move for regular bail.

Until disposal of their bail petition, this order will be in

force.

In the event of their arrest within the above period by

the Investigating Officer in respect of the above case, they
5

shall be released on bail on each of them executing a self

bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one surety for the

likesum.

Sd/-

JUDGE

PB

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation