HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2714 / 2017
Smt. Anita @ Ansai W/o Sh. Kesu Lal Sen, Resident of Madara,
Tehsil Gogunda Police Station Ogna, District Udaipur.
—-Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan
—-Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Deepak Menaria.
For Respondent(s) : Mr.Deepak Choudhary, P.P.
For Complainant(s): Mr.B.S.Deora.
_____________________________________________________
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
30/03/2017
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the
petitioner apprehending her arrest in connection with F.I.R.
No.11/2017, P.S. Ogna, District Udaipur, for the offences under
Sections 354 I.P.C., 7, 8, 17 of POCSO Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public
Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the
material available on record.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances available on
record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the
Bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of petitioner Smt. Anita @ Ansai in
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-2714/2017]
connection with F.I.R. No.11/2017, P.S. Ogna, District Udaipur, for
the offences under Sections, the petitioner shall be released on
bail; provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the
following conditions :-
(i). that the petitioner(s) shall make himself/herself/themselves
available for interrogation by a police officer as and when
required;
(ii). that the petitioner(s) shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing
such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii). that the petitioner(s) shall not leave India without previous
permission of the court.
(SANDEEP MEHTA)J.
/tarun goyal/
Sr.P.A
