Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2021
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.1946 OF 2020
1. SMT CHAND BEGUM
W/O ABDUL SALAM
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS.
2. SRI. ABDUL SALAM
S/O SAHIK ABDULLA SAHEB
AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS.
3. SMT. SHAHANAZ BEGUM
D/O ABDUL SALAM
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.
PETIONERS No.1 to 3 ARE
RESIDING AT NO.5/12,
NATHAM, CHANGALPATTU DISTRICT
TAMIL NADU STATE-603002.
4. SMT NOWSHAD BEGUM @
D/O ABDUL SALAM
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.5/32-A,
PASITH STREET, CHANGALPATTU DISTRICT,
TAMIL NADU STREET-603002
(BY SRI.RUDRAPPA P., ADVOCATE)
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WOMEN POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY S.P.P.
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
2. SMT. ROSHAN SABA
W/O MOHAMMED SIDDIQ RIYAZ
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
NEAR FIVE LIGHT CIRCLE
(BY SRI.RAHUL RAI K., HCGP. FOR R1)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 482 OF THE CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH
THE ENTIRE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN CR.NO.
150/2019 REGISTERED IN WOMEN POLICE STATION,
MYSURU AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 4TH
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,
COURT, MYSURU FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S
498-4 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3AND 4 OF
DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT 1961.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Mr.Rudrappa.P., learned counsel for the
petitioners is present before the court physically.
Learned HCGP for respondent-State is present
before the Court physically.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that the petitioners-accused in
C.C.No.281/2021 arising out of Crime No.150/2019
registered by the Women P.S., Devaraja Sub-Division,
Mysuru for the offences punishable under Section
Dowry Prohibition Act have been acquitted. Therefore,
this petition has become infructuous. Hence, he has
filed a memo seeking permission of the court to
withdraw the petition as not pressed.
The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not