SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Smt. Manju vs State Of U.P. on 9 December, 2019


?Court No. – 68

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 54493 of 2019

Applicant :- Smt. Manju

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Pathak,Manoj Kumar

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Bachchoo Lal,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is Nanad of the deceased. She has falsely been implicated in the present case. In postmortem report the cause of death has been shown asphyxia as a result of ante mortem hanging. It appears that the deceased has committed suicide herself. The applicant has no concern with the alleged incident. The applicant was residing separate from the deceased and her husband at 1216, near B.G.M. School, Shivaji Nagar, District Jhansi which is far away from the house of her parents. It has further been submitted that applicant is not the beneficiary of alleged demand of dowry. The marriage of applicant was solemnized about 20 years back from the alleged incident. The co-accused Govind Singh Kushwaha has already been released on bail by this court vide order dated 6.12.20-19 in Cr. Misc. Bail Application No. 54171 of 2019, therefore, applicant is also entitled for bail. There is no direct evidence against the applicant. The applicant has no criminal history and is in jail since 4.11.2019.

Per contra; learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

Let the applicant Smt. Manju involved in Case Crime No. 281 of 2019, under Sectionsection 498A, Section304B IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kotwali, District Jhansi be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

2. She shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and she shall cooperate with the trial.

3. She shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned.

In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.

Order Date :- 9.12.2019




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation