SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Smt Nisha Sharma vs State on 29 January, 2020

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3284/2018

1. Smt Nisha Sharma W/o Sh. Mahendra Sharma, Aged
About 46 Years, Old Housing Board , Near Lovely Factory ,
Suratgarh Distt. Sri Ganganagar

2. Mahendra Sharma S/o Purosotam Lal Sharma, Aged
About 52 Years, Old Housing Board , Near Lovely Factory ,
Suratgarh Distt. Sri Ganganagar

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. State, Through Pp

2. Smt. Shalini Sharma W/o Sanjay Sharma, Aged About 25
Years, D/o Sh. Dharampal , R/o C/o Chandra Bhan
Solanki , Ward No 14, Near Animal Hospital , Purani Abadi
, Sri Ganganagar

—-Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3050/2018
Sanjay Sharma S/o Sh. Mahendra Sharma, Aged About 27 Years,
Old Housing Board , Near Lovely Factory , Suratgarh Distt. Sri
Ganganagar At Present Residing At Bikaner

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. State, Through Pp

2. Smt. Shalini Sharma W/o Sanjay Sharma, Aged About 25
Years, Chandra Bhan Solanki , Ward No 14, Near Animal
Hostipal , Purani Abadi , Sri Ganganagar

—-Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishal Singhal.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP.

Mr. Rakesh Matoria.

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA

Order

29/01/2020

(Downloaded on 30/01/2020 at 08:50:08 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3284/2018]

These misc. petitions have been filed for seeking quashing of

FIR No.176/2018 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Sri

Ganganagar.

As per the factual report submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor, after conducting investigation and making efforts of

counselling, etc., the I.O. has found the offences under Sections

498A and 406 IPC made out against the petitioner Sanjay Sharma

being the husband of the complainant respondent NO.2 Smt.

Shalini Sharma.

In this background and, considering the limited scope of

interference in an FIR at the initial stage while exercising the

inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., this Court is not

inclined to quash the impugned FIR. Thus, the I.O. is directed to

file the result of the investigation in the court concerned in light of

the factual report. Needless to say that the petitioner Sanjay

Sharma shall be at liberty to raise all his objections before the trial

court at the appropriate stage.

With these observations and directions, the instant misc.

petitions as well as stay applications are disposed of. The

applications for vacating the stay orders dated 01.10.2018 and

19.09.2018 are also disposed of.

A copy of this order be placed in each file.

(SANDEEP MEHTA),J

4-Tikam/-

(Downloaded on 30/01/2020 at 08:50:08 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation