SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Smt. Rinki And 5 Others vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 23 October, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 44452 of 2019

Applicant :- Smt. Rinki And 5 Others

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Applicant :- Balbeer Singh

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Vipin Sinha,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

Applicants have moved the present anticipatory bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0524 of 2019, under Section 498A, Section323, Section504, Section506 Section313 I.P.C., P.S. Shahganj, District Agra.

I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the F.I.R. and also the anticipatory bail rejection order.

Contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case; this is a matrimonial dispute, where husband is not the party in the present case; applicant no.1 is sister-in-law, applicant no.2 is sister-in-law, applicant no.3 is brother-in-law, applicant no.4 is brother-in-law, applicant no.5 is mother-in-law and applicant no.6 is father-in-law; the matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to.

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicants.

Keeping in view the reasons as stated above, the facts and circumstances of the case as have been discussed at the Bar of this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation, the applicants are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

In the event of arrest of the applicants, Smt. Rinki and 5 Others involved in the aforesaid case, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police office;

(iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

Order Date :- 23.10.2019

Saif

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation