HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2267 / 2017 1. Smt Sabba @ Kherunisha W/o Sakir Ali 2. Smt Uruba @ Seeba D/o Sakir Ali 3. Sakir Ali S/o Fayaz Ali, All by Caste Muslim, Residents of Gandhi Vihar, Nearby Aksa Maszid, Khonagoriyan, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JVS Deora. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary, PP. For complainant : Mr. Talat Bari. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Order 28/03/2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the material available on record. This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.78/2016, registered at Women Police Station, District Nagaur for the offences under Sections 498A, 406, 323 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Having regard to the facts and circumstances available on record, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2267/2017] case, it is considered to be just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioners (1) Smt. Sabba @ Kherunisha, (2) Smt. Uruba @ Seeba and (3) Sakir Ali in connection with F.I.R. No.78/2016, registered at Women Police Station, District Nagaur, the petitioners shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :- (i). that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SANDEEP MEHTA), J.