1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6629/2019
BETWEEN:
1. Smt.Sarojamma,
W/o late Venkatesh,
Aged about 54 years,
Resident of No.14,
2nd Cross,
Old Bank Colony,
Konanakunte,
Bengaluru-560 062.
2. Sri.Anjinappa.C.R.,
S/o Late Ramappa,
Aged about 66 years,
Resident of
Chunchedenahalli,
Arabikothnur, Kolar District,
Karnataka-563 133.
…Petitioners
(By Sri.Basavaraju P., Advocate)
AND:
The State of Karnataka,
Konanakunte Police Station
Represented by
The State Public Prosecutor
2
High Court of Karnataka
Bengaluru-560 001.
…Respondent
(By Sri.Honnappa, HCGP)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of
Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the
event of their arrest in Cr.No.215/2019 of Konanakunte
Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offence p/u/s 498A,
304B r/w 34 of SectionIPC and Section 3 and 4 of D.P.Act.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Orders this day,
the Court made the following:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the
learned HCGP for the respondent-State. Perused the
records.
2. Petitioners are arraigned as accused Nos. 2
and 3 in Crime No.215/2019 registered by the
respondent-Police for the offence punishable under
Sections 498A, Section304B read with Section 34 of IPC and
Sections 3 and Section4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The brief factual matrix of the case are that the
complainant’s daughter by name Pallavi was given in
3
marriage to accused No.1-Naveen Kumar on 09.06.2019
and at the time of marriage, Rs.1,00,000/- cash and gold
articles were given for consideration of marriage. After
marriage, husband and wife together lived happily for 20
days. Thereafter, accused demanded Rs.1,00,000/- and it
is alleged that the above amount has been paid to the
accused. After some days, again they demanded for a sum
of Rs.1,00,000/- but complainant told that he had no
money and asked the deceased to wait for some time. It is
alleged that the accused have threatened the deceased
with dire consequences, if she does not bring money.
Afraid of such threat, the deceased committed suicide in
the house of the accused persons.
4. On perusal of the records, it shows that,
accused No.1 has already been arrested and in judicial
custody. The petitioner No.1 is aged about 55 years and
petitioner No.2 is aged about 66 years. The petitioner No.1
is a lady and there are no specific or distinct allegations
4
regarding the nature of ill-treatment and harassment or
cruelty given to the deceased except stating in the FIR that
there was a threat to bring some money. Within a span of
2 months the death has occurred in the house of the
accused. Petitioner No.2 is not residing with the accused
Nos. 1 and 2. He is resident of Arabikothnur, Kolar
District. When he visited the house of the accused and
when the incident took place, are not stated in the FIR
and it has to be proved during the course of full dressed
trial.
5. Looking to the nature of allegations and facts
of the case, in my opinion, petitioners-accused Nos. 2 and
3 are entitled for grant of anticipatory bail. Hence, the
following:
ORDER
The petition is allowed. Consequently, the petitioners-
accused Nos.2 and 3 shall be released on bail in the event
of their arrest in connection with Crime No.215/2019 of
5
Konanakunte Police Station, for the alleged offences,
subject to the following conditions:-
i) The petitioners shall surrender themselves
before the Investigating Officer within Ten
days from the date of receipt of a certified
copy of this order and each of them shall
execute their personal bonds for a sum of
Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with
two sureties for the like-sum to the
satisfaction of the concerned Investigating
Officer.
ii) The petitioners shall not indulge in hampering
the investigation or tampering the prosecution
witnesses.
iii) The petitioners shall co-operate with the
Investigating Officer to complete the
investigation, and they shall appear before the
Investigating Officer as and when called for.
iv) The petitioners shall not leave the jurisdiction
of Investigating Officer without prior
6
permission, till the charge sheet is filed or for
a period of three months whichever is earlier.
v) The petitioners shall mark their attendance
once in a week i.e, on every Sunday between
10.00 am and 5.00 pm., before the
Investigating Officer for a period of two
months or till the charge sheet is filed,
whichever is earlier.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SB