SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Smt. Shwetha K.S vs ) Sri Srinivasa H.V on 18 December, 2017

IN THE COURT OF THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
TRAFFIC COURT – IV, BANGALORE

PRESENT: GAYATHRI.S.KATE, B.com, LLB.,
MMTC – IV, BANGALORE

DATED : THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

PETITIONER: Smt. Shwetha K.S.,
W/o. Srinivasa H.V.,
Age: 30 years,
R/at No.154/1,
Hoddetty Nilaya,
Siddareddy Road,
Doddanekundi Post,
Marathahalli,
Bangalore – 560 037

VS.

RESPONDENT: 1) Sri Srinivasa H.V.,
S/o. Venkappa H.G.,
Age: 34 years,
R/at No.154/1,
Hoddetty Nilaya,
Siddareddy Road,
Doddanekundi Post,
Marathahalli,
Bangalore – 560 037

Now Working at:

Srinviasa H.V.,
Over Seas Business Manager,
Jinwoo SMC Co., Ltd.,
# 266-7, OSAN-RI,
Chunpo-myun, Iksan City,
Jellabuk Province,
Jeonju – 570952 (Republic of Korea)
2 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

Chollabuk, Korea South,
Phone No.0082-63-8382529
Fax No.0082-63-8382527

2) Sri Venkappa H.G.,
S/o. Late Ganapathi,
Age: 62 years,
R/at No.154/1,
Hoddetty Nilaya,
Siddareddy Road,
Doddanekundi Post,
Marathahalli,
Bangalore – 560 037

3) Smt. Sharada,
W/o. Venkappa H.G.,
Age: 59 years,
R/at No.154/1,
Hoddetty Nilaya,
Siddareddy Road,
Doddanekundi Post,
Marathahalli,
Bangalore – 560 037

***

JUDGEMENT

This is a petition filed by the petitioner U/s.12 of
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
seeking relief’s U/s.18, 19, 20 and 22 of the said Act.

2. The case of the petitioner in brief is as under:

It is the case of the petitioner that she was married to 1st
respondent on 28-03-2012 in Amarashree Kalyana Mantap at
Sullia Town, Dakshina Kannada District as per Hindu Rites
and Customs. During the time of the marriage as per the
3 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

demand of the respondents, the parents of the applicant gave
sufficient gold ornaments and silver articles and other house
hold articles to the respondents worth of Rs.10 Lakhs and
spent about Rs.5 Lakhs towards the marriage expenditure.
The said marriage was registered in the office of the Sub-
Registrar at Sullia on 02-04-2012. After the marriage
ceremony, on the same night of 28-03-2012 the applicant was
taken to her matrimonial house at Bangalore, as the
respondents are permanent resident of Bangalore city in the
address shown above. The 1st respondent is the only son and
he has one younger sister who also is in Germany. The 1st
respondent is an Engineer, working as Overseas Business
Manager in a private company at South Korea. On the same
night of the marriage, the mother-in-law gave an old saree to
the applicant and asked her to keep all the footwear’s inside
which belonged to them except her footwear. On the next day
on wards her mother-in-law used to listen the conversations
which she was having over mobile whenever the applicant
speaks with her parents. Whenever they gone to temples, she
used to offer pooja in the names of her family members except
in the name of applicant. Since the 1st respondent is working
in South Korea, the applicant needed VISA to go to South
Korea along with him, hence both were planned to go to
Mumbai after staying few days in matrimonial home. On that
day when they were ready to go to Mumbai, her father-in-law
/ the 2nd respondent started to abuse the applicant saying
that for their bad luck they got such a bride and nobody was
there to marry her, she is not a suitable girl for his son in any
4 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

manner and there were several good and rich proposals came
to his son etc. He is an Ex-serviceman and a dominated
person. He had abused the applicant and insulted her parents
in front of her and asked her to go out of his house and
thrown all her belongs, hence she came to her friend’s room.
On the same evening her husband came and took her to
Mumbai. After few days she got VISA and she requested her
husband to go to her parents house near Mangalore and
thereafter a day go back to Bangalore. But the 1st respondent
got angry and asked her to sign on a blank paper and go to
her parent’s house. Finally on her request he came up to
Mangalore city and left her in the bus stand and he went to
Bangalore. The applicant alone gone to her parents house at
Sullia which is about 100 k.m. from Mangalore City. After 4
days the applicant went to her matrimonial house at
Bangalore along with her parents. The respondents all
together started to abuse the applicant and her parents even
before entering to their house. They had insulted her and her
parents and degraded them. The parents of the applicant tried
to pacify them and begged their pardon and went back to their
home. The applicant and her parents have controlled them
slaves with the hope that the 1st respondent will take the
applicant to Korea along with him and may lead happy
married life. But after few days during the month of May
2012 the 1st respondent alone left for Korea saying that he has
to report his duty immediately and also he has to search for a
house for the family accommodation and there after he will
call the applicant etc. As per his assurance the applicant
5 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

stayed in her matrimonial house along with her in-laws. Only
for few days, the 1st respondent used to speak in e-mail,
thereafter he discontinued the contacts and his whereabouts
was not know to her. He did not give his phone number or his
address to her. When she asked with her in-laws they were
refused to give and started to abuse the applicant saying that
who is she to ask all those things as she has not brought
anything from her parents, as such the 2nd and 3rd
respondents were harassed the applicant and gave her mental
torture. The 2nd respondent used to ask the applicant to keep
her jewels in the bank locker. IN the earlier occasion when the
2nd and 3rd respondents were talking with the mother of the
applicant that they construct a house if they are supported
with financially by the applicants side. The respondent are not
satisfied with the jewels and other items given by the parents
of the applicant. The applicant told about these harassments
given by her in-laws with the 1st respondent when he came to
Bangalore for this sister’s marriage during the month of
November 2012. He replied that she can take a separate house
by borrowing money from her parents or to stay in his house
without rasising any voice. He left for Kroea within 7 days
saying that he will arrange the house and VISA and call the
applicant but remained silent. Thereafter the in-laws are
objecting the applicant to reside in their house and are trying
to send her to her parents house by giving her maximum
torture. Hence she had given a complaint to Halasur gate
women police station on 18-09-2013. The police sent the
complaint for family counseling at Prihar in the office of the
6 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

Commissioner. The 1st respondent had appeared one or two
times and sought for time to take her but thereafter remained
absent and left Korea without intimating anybody. The 1st
respondent got married with the applicant with an assurance
that he will take her to South Korea few days of the marriage,
there after the postponed to take her and failed to give her
marital life. Several panchayaths were held on that regard in
the presence of well wishers and elders of the family and
finally by the family counseling but one or the other reasons
he avoided her to take along with him even after lapse of 1
year 8 months. On the other hand the respondents are
harassed her and given mental torture and declined to keep
her in the matrimonial house. Hence the applicant has been
cheated by the respondents. The 1st respondent is only the
son, working as a Over Seas Business Manager at South
Korea, since 8 years drawing salary more than Rs.2 Lakhs of
Indian rupees per month and owns a flat at Mumbai. The
respondents are residing in their own house situated in the
above address which is the matrimonial home. The applicant
is not working and she does not have independent sources of
income to maintain herself. The 2nd respondent after his
retirement from Air Force joined DRDO hence he is getting
sufficient retirement amount. The 1st respondent does not
have other commitments than to look after the applicant. His
sister an Engineer got married and working at Germany.
Wherefore it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to
order of following reliefs:

7 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

a) Pass residence order as provided U/s.17, 19(a)(d)(e) and

(f)(2)(3)(7) of the Act and to direct the respondents No.1,
2, 3 to allow her to reside in the matrimonial house /
shared house hold No.154/1, “Hoddetty Nilaya”,
Siddareddy Road, Doddanekundi Post, Marathalli,
Bangalore – 560 037 OR

To direct the 1st respondent to secure the same level of
alternative accommodation to the applicant by paying
the rent around Rs.15,000/- p.m. with security deposit
of Rs.2 Lakhs.

b) Protection orders to prohibit the respondents
committing any act of domestic violence as provided
U/s.18(a)(b)(f)(q) of the Act. Providing with police
protection.

c) Direct the 1st respondent to pay monetary reliefs for the
maintenance of the applicant / complainant a total sum
of Rs.40,000/- p.m. or to pay lump sum amount of
Rs.90 Lakh as provided U/s.20(2)(3) of the Act.

d) To pay a total compensation of Rs.90 Lakh as provided
U/s.22 of the Act.

e) Direct the respondent to pay the litigation expenses of
Rs.30,000/- to the applicant.

Any other order, direction, reliefs which deems fit in the
facts and circumstances of the case and cost of the case.
In the interest of justice and equity.

8 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

3. After registration of the case, summons was issued to the
respondents and they appeared through their counsel and
filed detailed statement of objection denying each and every
allegations made against them and pray for the dismissal of
petition.

4. In order to substantiate their respective contentions, the
petitioner got examined herself as P.W.1 and got marked 21
documents as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.21. The respondent No.1 got
examined himself as R.W.1 and examined 3 other witnesses
on his behalf as R.W.2 to R.W.4 and got marked 8 documents
as Ex.R.1 to Ex.R.8.

5. Heard arguments on both the sides, perused the petition,
objection and available materials on record.

6. The following points would arise for my consideration.

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled for
the relief’s as sought in the petition?

2. What order?

7. On perusal of materials before this court, My findings on the
above said points are as under:

1. POINT No.1: IN THE NEGATIVE

2. POINT No.2: AS PER FINAL ORDER

For the following
REASONS

8. POINT No.1: To file a petition U/s.12 of the Act, it is
necessary that the petitioner has to establish two things
9 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

firstly, she must establish that, the petitioner and respondent
or respondents lived or are living together, in a domestic
relationship. Secondly, that the respondent or respondents
have subjected her to acts of domestic violence. To prove the
domestic relationship the petitioner is required to prove that
she and the respondents have lived together in a relationship
of marriage or in a relationship in the nature of marriage or
related by consanguinity or adoption or as family members
living together as a joint family. To prove the act of domestic
violence the petitioner is required o prove any one or more of
the acts committed by the respondent or respondents as
contemplated U/s.3 of the Act.

9. In the present case the petitioner got examined herself as
P.W.1 and got marked 21 documents from Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.21.
The respondent No.1 has not disputed the marital status since
the respondent No.1 has admitted the marriage and paternity
the relationship between the petitioner and respondent No.1 is
not in dispute and hence the said point is not seriously
contested.

10. During the course of cross-examination of P.W.1 she has
deposed to the following: £Á£ÀÄ ºÁQgÀĪÀ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è EgÀĪÀ
«µÀAiÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ UÉÆwÛgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. £Á£ÀÄ ©E.,JAJ¸ï N¢gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. £Á£ÀÄ ¦f
ªÀiÁrzÉÝÃ£É JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. £Á£ÀÄ 2008£Éà E¸À«AiÀÄ°è ¦f N¢
ªÀÄÄV¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. £À£Àß ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 1£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄzÀÄªÉ arrange
marriage DVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÀÄzÀĪÉVAvÀ ªÀÄÄAZÉ ¤ÃªÀÅ JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ §UÉÎ
10 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 1£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ «zÁå¨sÁå¸À ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÉ®¸ÀzÀ §UÉÎ w½zÀÄPÉÆArgÀÄwÛÃgÁ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgÉzÀÄ DUÀ CªÀgÀÄ 9 wAUÀ¼ÀÄ
¨sÁgÀvÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. 1£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ 2006£Éà E¸À«¬ÄAzÀ
¸Ëvï PÉÆjAiÀiÁzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. ªÀÄzÀĪÉVAvÀ ªÀÄÄAZÉ £À£ÀߣÀÄß ¸Ëvï
PÉÆjAiÀiÁPÉÌ PÀgÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ºÉÆÃUÀÄvÁÛgÉAzÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀÄPÀvÉAiÀiÁVvÀÄÛ JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj.
ªÀzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ 1 wAUÀ¼À M¼ÀUÉ 1£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀÄä£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄA§¬ÄUÉ
PÀgÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ºÉÆÃV «Ã¸Á ªÀiÁr¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ £Á£ÀÄ MAzÀÄ ªÁgÀ
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À°è £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°èzÉÝ JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ
¢£À¢AzÀ E°èAiÀĪÀgÉUÉ £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è JµÀÄÖ ¢£À EzÉÝ
JA§ÄzÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ £É£À¦gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. F PÉøÀ£ÀÄß ºÁPÀĪÀ
¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀ «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÁæ JAzÀÄ ¥Àæ²ß¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
£Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß £ÉAlgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°èzÉÝ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £À£Àß £ÉAlgÀÄ
ªÀÄAUÀ¼ÀÆj£ÀªÀgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ CªÀgÀÄ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À°èzÀÝgÀÄ. £Á£ÀÄ Hj£À°ègÀivÉÛãÉ
PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸À® F PÉùUÉÆøÀÌgÀ E°èUÉ §AzÀÄ £À£Àß £ÉAlgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄvÉÛãÉ
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. F PÉøÀ£ÀÄß ºÁQzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ°®è JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. ¤ÃªÀÅ ¤ªÀÄä ¥ÀæªÀiÁt¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ¤ªÀÄä UÀAqÀ£À
ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ «¼Á¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ºÉýgÀÄwÛÃgÁ DzÀgÉ ¤ÃªÀÅ C°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ
¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ £À£ÀUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà SÁAiÀÄA «¼Á¸À EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è CzÀÄ £À£Àß
ªÉʪÁ»PÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀiÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀÄ MAzÉÆAzÀÄ ¸À®
MAzÉÆAzÀÄ £ÉAlgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°ègÀÄvÉÛÃ£É CªÀgÀ «¼Á¸À £À£Àß ºÀwÛgÀ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è
11 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ ¤ªÀÄä Cfð CxÀªÁ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è ºÉýgÀĪÀ
«¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸À E®èzÉ EzÀÝgÀÄ ¸ÀºÀ D «¼Á¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀļÁîV PÉÆnÖgÀÄwÛÃgÁ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ CzÀÄ £À£Àß ªÉÄnæªÉÆäAiÀÄ¯ï ºÉÆêÀiï JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ MAzÀĪÁgÀQÌAvÀ ºÉaÑ£À ¢£À ¤ªÀÄä
UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è EgÀ°®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß CfðAiÀÄ°è gÀÆ.10®PÀë ¨É¯ÉAiÀÄ a£ÁߨÀsgÀtzÀ
«ªÀgÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß PÉÆnÖ®è JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß CfðAiÀÄ°è ºÉýzÀAvÀ
gÀÆ.10®PÀë ¨É¯ÉAiÀÄ a£Àß ¨É½î ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¨ÉÃgÉ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¸ÀA§AzÀs¥ÀlÖ
©®ÄèUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸À®Ä vÉÆAzÀgÉ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ ºÉýzÁUÉ gÀÆ.10®PÀë ¨É¯ÉAiÀÄ a£Àß ¨É½î ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
¨ÉÃgÉ ¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀjUÉ PÉÆnÖ®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.

£Á£ÀÄ F PÉøÀ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁPÀĪÀ
¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è CzÀgÀ°è K£ÀÆ §gÉ¢zÉ JA§ÄªÀÅzÀ£ÀÄß w½zÀÄPÉÆArgÀÄvÉÛãÉ.
¤ÃªÀÅ F PÉù£À°è protection officer ¬ÄAzÀ AiÀƪÀÅzÉà ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
vÀgÀ¹®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ vÀj¹gÀÄvÉÛÃªÉ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ
F CfðAiÀÄ°è £ÀªÀÄÆzÁVgÀĪÀ ¤ªÀÄä «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁV®è DzÀÝjAzÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ
GzÉÝñÀ¥ÀǪÀðPÀªÁV protection officer ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀgÀ¹®è
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀj¹gÀÄvÉÛÃ£É JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.
¤.¦.12gÀ°ègÀĪÀ zÀÆgÀ£ÀÄß PÀÉÆqÀĪÀ DgÀÄ wAUÀ¼À ªÀÄÄAZÀÉ ¤ªÀÄä vÁ¬ÄAiÀÄ
12 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉÝ JAzÀÄ D zÀÆj£À°è ºÉýgÀÄwÛÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ
¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤.¦.12gÀ°è £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ CvÉÛ
ªÀiÁªÀ £À£ÀUÉ vÉÆAzÀgÉ PÉÆlÖgÀÄ JA§ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ºÉý®è JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj.
¤.¦.12gÀ°ègÀĪÀ zÀÆj£À°è ¤ªÀÄUÉ JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ QgÀÄPÀļÀ PÉÆlÖgÀÄ JA§
«µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ºÉüÀ®Ä vÉÆAzÀgÉ EgÀ°®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ £Á£ÀÄ
D «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß CzÀgÀ°è ºÉý £À£Àß fêÀ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß complicate

ªÀiÁrPÉƼÀî¨ÉÃPÀÄ JAzÀÄ EgÀ°®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀÄUÉ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà jÃwAiÀÄ vÉÆAzÀgÉ PÉÆnÖ®è DzÀÝjAzÀ ¸ÀzÀj «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃªÀÅ D
zÀÆj£À°è ºÉý®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.
ªÀÄzÀÄªÉ DzÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÀAiÀÄ°è §gÉà MAzÀÄ ªÁgÀ ªÀiÁvÀæ
E¢ÝgÀÄwÛÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ CzÀQÌAvÀ eÁ¹Û ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ EzÀÉÝ
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ªÀÄä UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°èzÁÝUÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ ºÉýzÁUÉ ¤ªÀÄUÉ
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà jÃwAiÀÄ QgÀÄPÀļÀ PÉÆnÖ®è CzÀ£ÀÄß ¤ÃªÀÅ ¸À馅 ªÀÆr ºÉüÀÄvÁÛ
E¢ÝÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ
ªÀiÁrzÀ post graduation UÉ ¸ÀA§AzÀs¥ÀlÖºÁUÉ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ JµÀÄÖ
¸ÀA§¼ÀzÀ PÉ®¸À ¹UÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀĪÀiÁgÀÄ gÀÆ.16,000.0
¹UÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ GzÉÝñÀ¥ÀǪÀðPÀªÁV PÀrªÉÄ ¹PÀÄÌvÀzÉ
JAzÀÄ ºÉüÀÄvÁÛ E¢ÝÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ fresher UÉ CµÀÉÖÃ
PÉÆqÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. 2008£ÀÉà E¸À«AiÀÄ°è £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß ¥ÀzÀ«AiÀÄ£ÀÄß
N¢ ªÀÄÄV¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß ¥ÀzÀ« ªÀÄÄV¹zÀ £ÀAvÀgÀ £Á£ÀÄ J¸ïJ¦
¯Áå¨ï£À°è PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛ EzÉÝ. DUÀ £À£UÀ É ¸ÀĪÀÆgÀÄ gÀÆ.50,000.00
13 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

¸ÀA§¼À §gÀÄvÁÛ EvÀÄÛ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. FUÀ £Á£ÀÄ D PÉ®¸ÀzÀ°è E®è
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £Á£ÀÄ D PÉ®¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ªÀÄzÀĪÉVAvÀ ªÀÄÄAZÉ ©mÉÖ. £Á£ÀÄ
MlÄÖ 3.5ªÀµÀð PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ ºÉÆÃVgÀÄvÉÛãÉ. £Á£ÀÄ PÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ ¸ÉÃjzÀ ¥ÁægÀA¨ÀszÀ°è
£À£ÀUÉ gÀÆ.18,000.00 ¸ÀA§¼À §gÀÄvÁÛ EvÀÄÛ. PÉêÀ® 3.5 ªÀµÀðzÀ°è ¤ªÀÄä
¸ÀA§¼À gÀÆ.50,000.00 D¬ÄvÀÄ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ CzÀÄ
technology ªÉÄÃ¯É depend DUÀÄvÀÛzÉ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ
ªÀiÁrzÀ post graduation ¬ÄAzÀ efficiency ªÀÄvÀÄÛ skill EzÉ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. FUÀ £Á£ÀÄ PÉ®¸À
ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛ E®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. FUÀ ¤ÃªÀÅ ¨ÉÃPÁzÀgÉ PÀÉ®¸ÀPÉÌ ¸ÉÃgÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ D technology FUÀ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ FUÀ PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛ EzÀÝgÀÄ ¸ÀºÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ
PÉ®¸À ªÀiÁqÀÄvÁÛ E®è JAzÀÄ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ ¸ÀļÀÄî ºÉüÀÄvÁÛ E¢ÝÃgÁ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. FUÀ®Æ £Á£ÀÄ
¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉÝÃ£É JAzÀgÉ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è. £Á£ÀÄ FUÀ Hj¤AzÀ
PÉùUÉÆøÀÌgÀ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆjUÉ §gÀÄvÁÛ EzÉÝÃ£É JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £À£Àß
AiÀÄdªÀiÁ£ÀjUÉ wAUÀ½UÉ gÀÆ.2®PÀë ¸ÀA§¼À §gÀÄvÁÛ EzÉ JAzÀÄ vÉÆÃj¸À®Ä
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÁR¯Áw ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ ¤ªÀÄä CfðAiÀÄ°è ºÉýzÁUÉ ¤ªÀÄä AiÀÄdªÀiÁ£ÀjUÉ gÀÆ.2®PÀë
¸ÀA§¼À §gÀÄvÁÛ E®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ªÀÄzÀÄªÉ ¥Àæ¸ÁÛ¥À
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ §AzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è CªÀjUÉ CµÀÄÖ ¸ÀA§¼À §gÀÄvÁÛ EzÉ JAzÀÄ
ºÉýgÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.

14 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

¤ÃªÀÅ ¤ªÀÄä CfðAiÀÄ°è ¤ªÀÄUÉ gÀÆ.40,000.00 fêÀ£ÁA±À CxÀªÁ
MlÄÖ gÀÆ.90®PÀë ¨ÉÃPÀÄ JAzÀÄ ºÉýgÀÄwÛÃgÁ CzÀ£ÀÄß AiÀiÁªÀ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄïÉ
PÉý¢ÝÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¥Àæ²ß¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É £À£Àß
AiÀÄdªÀiÁ£ÀgÀÄ £À£ÀߣÀÄß ©lÄÖ ¸Ëvï PÉÆjAiÀiÁPÉÌ ºÉÆÃVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ ªÀÄzÀĪÉ
fêÀ£ÀzÀ°è AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà jÃwAiÀÄ »vÁ¸ÀQÛ vÉÆÃj¸ÀÄvÁÛ E®è ªÀÄvÀÄÛ £À£ÀߣÀÄß
PÀgÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ºÉÆÃUÀ¨ÉÃPÀÄ JAzÀÄ £Á£ÀÄ F PÉøÀ£ÀÄß ºÁQgÀÄvÉÛÃ£É CªÀjUÉ
ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀgɸÀ¨ÉÃPÁ CxÀªÁ E®èªÁ JA§ÄzÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ UÉÆwÛ®è
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £À£Àß ªÀÄ£É ¨ÁrUÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢£À¤vÀåzÀ RaðUÉ PÉýgÀÄvÉÛãÉ
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. £ÀªÀÄUÉ ªÀÄPÀ̽®è JAzÀgÉ ¸Àj. £ÀªÀÄä ªÀÄzÀĪÉ
consummate DVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¤ªÀÄUÉ wAUÀ½UÉ gÀÆ.40,000.00 fêÀ£ÁA±À
¨ÉÃPÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.

JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¤ªÀÄä£ÀÄß ªÀģɬÄAzÀ MvÁÛAiÀÄ¢AzÀ ºÉÆgÀUÉ ºÁQ®è
¤ÃªÉà ¸ÀévÀB ªÀģɬÄAzÀ ºÉÆgÀUÉ ºÉÆÃVgÀÄwÛÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄi
¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À°è EgÀĪÀ JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
ºÉÆÃV ¤ªÀÄUÉ EgÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà vÉÆAzÀgÉ E®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
¸ÀjAiÀÄ®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ¨ÉAUÀ¼ÀÆj£À «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ¤ªÀÄä
CvÉÛ ªÀiÁªÀ ªÀiÁvÀæ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÁÝgÉ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ªÀÄä AiÀÄdªÀiÁ£ÀjUÉ M§â¼ÀÄ ¸ÀºÀÉÆÃzÀj EzÀÄÝ CªÀ½UÉ
ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁV vÀ£Àß UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°èzÁÝ¼É JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ F PÉøÀ£ÀÄß ºÁPÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è
15 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉÝÃ£É JAzÀÄ ºÉýgÀÄwÛÃgÁ JAzÀÄ
¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ CzÀÄ £À£Àß matrimonial house JAzÀÄ £Á£ÀÄ
D «¼Á¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß PÉÆnÖgÀÄvÉÛÃ£É JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ. ¤ÃªÀÅ ¸ÀzÀj «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ¸ÀévÀB
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ°®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.
¸ÁQëUÉ CªÀgÀ ªÀÄzÀsåAvÀgÀ CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉÆÃj¹ ¤ÃªÀÅ CzÀgÀ°è gɹqÉ£ïì
DqÀðgï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ µÉÃgï ºË¸ï ºÉÆïïØ£À°è ªÁ¸ÀªÀiÁrPÉÆAqÀÄ ºÉÆÃUÀ®Ä
C£ÀĪÀÄwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß PÉý CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ºÁQgÀÄwÛÃgÁ CzÀgÀ°è
ºÉýgÀĪÀ «µÀAiÀÄ ¤d CxÀªÁ ¸ÀļÁî JAzÀÄ ¥Àæ²ß¹ ¸ÁQëUÉ ¸ÀzÀj
CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÉÆÃj¹zÁUÀ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ £Á£ÀÄ F PÉøÀ£ÀÄß ºÁPÀĪÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄzÀ°è
£À£Àß matrimonial house £À°è EgÀ°®è JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrzÀgÀÄ.

¸ÀzÀj PÉÃ¸ï £ÀqÉAiÀÄĪÁUÀ £Á£ÀÄ PÀ®A 17 ¦qÀ§Æèår« DPïÖ
CrAiÀÄ°è 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÞ 01 CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. ¸ÀzÀj
Cfð ¥ÀæPÁgÀ ¨ÁA¨ÉAiÀÄ°è £Á£ÀÄ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ EgÀĪÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ®Ä PÉÆÃjgÀÄvÉÛãÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¹zÁUÀ ¸ÀzÀj CfðAiÀÄ
¥ÁæxÀð£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀ°®è. 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÀÝ ¨ÁA§É ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
£Á£ÀÄ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉÝ. £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉݪÀÅ. K¦æ¯ï 2012 gÀ°è 15 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À PÁ® ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉݪÀÅ. £Á£ÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÁ¸ÀªÁV EzÀÄzÀÝPÁÌV
£ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÁRP¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è ¸ÀzÀj
zÁR¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¸À®Ä AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÁR¯É E®è. ¸ÀzÀj
16 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄÄ 8£Éà ªÀĺÀrAiÀÄ°èzÀÄÝ ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ ªÀÄ£É £ÀA £É£À¦gÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¸ÀzÀj
ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è 02 ¨ÉqïgÀÆA, 01 CrUɪÀÄ£É, 01 ºÁ¯ï ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ ¨ÁV®
¢PÀÄÌ AiÀiÁªÀ ¢QÌUÉAzÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ UÉÆwÛ®è. ¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è £Á£ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ £ÀÄr¢gÀĪÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ
¸ÀzÀj ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¨ÁrUÉUÉ ¤ÃrzÀÄÝgÀÄ JAzÀÄ ¸ÁQëUÉ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. £À£ÀUÉ ¨ÁA¨ÉAiÀÄ°è GzÉÆåÃUÀ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ D¸ÀQÛ
EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¨ÁA¨ÉAiÀÄ°è £À£ÀUÉ ¸ÀA§A¢üPÀgÀÄ EzÁÝgÉ DzÀgÉ CªÀgÀÄ J°è
EgÀĪÀgÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ AiÀiÁªÀ «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÁÝgÉAzÀÄ ºÉüÀ®Ä DUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
£À£ÀUÉ ¨ÁA¨ÉAiÀÄ°è fêÀ£À £ÀqɸÀ®Ä CUÀvÀåªÁzÀ PÁgÀt ºÉüÀ®Ä DUÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
PÁgÀt £À£Àß §½ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. £Á£ÀÄ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ eÉÆvÉ
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀQÌAvÀ ¨ÁA¨É ¥sÁèmï£À°è DVgÀĪÀÅzÉà ºÉZÀÄÑ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ
¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¨ÁA¨ÉAiÀÄ°è £Á£ÀÄ M§â¼ÉÃ
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀÆPÀÛªÀ®è JAzÀgÉ ºËzÀÄ. 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀjUÉ vÉÆAzÀgÉ
¤ÃqÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ PÀ®A 17 D¥sï ¦qÀ§Æèår DPïÖ £À ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
zÀÄgÀÄzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÉÛÃ£É JAzÀgÉ ¸ÀļÀÄî. £Á£ÀÄ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ
D¹ÛAiÀÄ£ÀÄß JwÛ ºÁPÀĪÀ GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ ¸ÀzÀj CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉAzÀgÉ
¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. £Á£ÀÄ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ
¨ÉÃPÀÄ JAzÀÄ PËlÄA©PÀ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸À°è¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ
¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¸ÀzÀj CfðAiÀÄ£ÀÄß
zÁR°¸À®Ä £À£ÀUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà vÉÆAzÀgÉ EgÀ°®è. £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ
17 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹gÀĪÀ ¸ÀzÀj zsÁªÉAiÀÄ°è CA±ÀªÀÅ £À£Àß ºÉýPÉAiÀÄ ªÉÄÃgÉUÉ ªÀQîgÀÄ
zÁªÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹ £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄPÉÌ ºÁdgÀÄ¥Àr¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. DAUÀè ¨sÁµÉ £À£UÀ É
w½¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ ¸ÀzÀj CA±ÀªÀÅ £À£ÀUÉ UÉÆvÀÄÛ ¸ÀzÀj CA±ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß £Á£ÀÄ N¢
w½zÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ ¸À» ºÁQgÀÄvÉÛãÉ. ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ ¢£À¢AzÀ JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ
£À£ÀUÉ zÉÊ»PÀ »A¸É ¤ÃrzÀÝgÀÄ JAzÀÄ CfðAiÀÄ°è w½¹gÀĪÀAvÉ zÉÊ»PÀ »A¸É
¤ÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¸ÀzÀj »A¸É¬ÄAzÀ £À£ÀUÉ
UÁAiÀÄUÀ¼ÁVzÀݪÀÅ. ¸ÀzÀj UÁAiÀiÁUÀ½UÉ £Á£ÀÄ aQvÉìAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. ¸ÀzÀj
aQvÉì ¥ÀqÉzÀzÀPÁÌV £Á£ÀÄ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà zÁR¯ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß £À£Àß §½ EgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
¸ÀzÀj aQvÉìAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉAiÀÄzÉ ¸ÀļÀÄî ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ «gÀÄzÀÝ
¸À°è¹gÀÄvÉÛÃ£É ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. £Á£ÀÄ
zÁR°¹gÀĪÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ®UÀvÀÄÛ DVgÀĪÀ zÁR¯ÉUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀjAiÀiÁVzÉAiÉÄà JAzÀÄ
¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. £À£Àß ªÀÄÄRå«ZÁgÀuÉ
¥ÀæªÀiÁt ¥ÀvÀæzÀ°è £Á£ÀÄ ªÁ¸ÀªÁV EgÀzÉà EzÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è
ºÉýgÀĪÀAvÀºÀ «¼ÀÁ¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀÄvÉÛÃ£É JAzÀÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî ºÉýgÀÄvÉÛãÉAzÀÄ
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀægÀPÀtzÀ°è
JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀĪÀ «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ¥ÀÅ£ÀB £Á£ÀÄ ºÉÆÃV CªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ®Ä £À£ÀUÉãÁzÀgÀÆ vÉÆAzÀgÉ EzÉAiÉÄà JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ
M¼§â¼ÉúÉÆÃV CªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ®Ä vÉÆAzÀgÉ EzÉà JAzÀÄ ¸ÁQë
£ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. AiÀiÁªÀ vÉÆAzÀgÉ EzÉà JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ CªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ
£À£ÀUÉ QgÀÄPÀļÀ ¤ÃqÀÄvÁÛgÉ JAzÀÄ ºÉýzÀgÀÄ. ¸ÀzÀj «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ®Ä
£À£ÀUÉ EµÀÖ«®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ.

18 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà QgÀÄPÀļÀ PÉÆqÀz¢zÀÝgÀÆ £Á£ÀÄ CªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À
«gÀÄzÀÞ ¸ÀļÀÄî ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¹gÀÄvÉÛãÉAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî
JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¸ÀĪÀ PÁ®zÀ°è £Á£ÀÄ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è
vÉÆÃj¹gÀĪÀ «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è ªÁ¸ÀªÁVzÉÝÃ. ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¸ÀzÀj «¼Á¸À¢AzÀ £À£ÀߣÀÄß ºÉÆgÀ
ºÁPÀĪÀ ¥ÀæAiÀÄvÀß JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÀvÀå. «¼Á¸ÀzÀ°è £Á£ÀÄ
ªÁ¸ÀªÁVgÀ¢zÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ ¸ÀļÀÄî DgÉÆÃ¥À ªÀiÁr ¸ÀļÀÄî ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß
zÁR°¹gÀÄvÉÛÃ£É JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ.
¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ CA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀvÀåPÉÌ zÀÆgÀªÁVzÉ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ
¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ »A¸É PÉÆnÖgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ
¥ÀævÀåPÀë zÀ²ðUÀ¼ÀÄ EzÁÝgÉAiÉÄà JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ºËzÀÄ JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¥ÀævÀåPÀë zÀ²ðUÀ¼À ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀĤ¯ïPÀĪÀiÁgï, ¸ÀÆgÁå£ÀAzï,
DVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ¸ÀĤ¯ïPÀĪÀiÁgï £À£Àß CtÚ£ÁVzÀÄÝ ¸ÀÆgÁå£ÀAzï
ªÀiÁªÀ£ÀªÀgÁVgÀÄvÁÛgÉ. ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀ£ÀÄß £ÁåAiÀiÁ®AiÀÄzÀ°è ¸ÁQë ªÀiÁr¹gÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
¥ÀæPÀgÀtzÀ°è ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀ §UÉÎ ªÀiÁ»wAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¤ÃrgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀÄ
JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ QgÀÄPÀļÀ ¤ÃrgÀĪÀ §UÉÎ £ÉÆÃrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ ºÁUÀÆ AiÀiÁªÀ
¢£ÁAPÀ ¸ÀªÀÄAiÀÄ JAzÀÄ ºÉüÀ®Ä DUÀĪÀÅ¢®è. JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ°è £Á£ÀÄ
21 ¢£ÀUÀ¼À PÁ® EzÉÝãÀÄ. 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ UÀ¯ÁmÉ DzÁUÀ £Á£ÀÄ
ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ©lÄÖ ¸ÉßûvÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÀUÉ ºÉÆÃVzÉÝ JAzÀÄ zÀÆj£À w½¹gÀĪÀ jÃw
D ¸ÉßûvÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ £À£ÀUÉ £É£À¦gÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¸ÀzÀj ¸ÉßûvÀgÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ «¼Á¸À
£À£ÀUÉ £É£À¦gÀĪÀÅ¢®è. ¸ÀzÀjAiÀĪÀgÀ ºÉ¸ÀgÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ «¼Á¸ÀÀªÀ£ÀÄß
£É£À¦£À°èlÄÖPÉƼÀÄîªÀÅzÀÄ ¸ÁzÀsåªÁVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è. zÀÆj£À°è ºÉýgÀĪÀ J¯Áè
19 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

«ZÁgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÀvÀåPÉÌ zÀÆgÀªÁVzÉ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. £À£ÀUÉ 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÀA¸ÁgÀ £ÀqɸÀ®Ä MmÁÖV
§¼Á®Ä EµÀÖ«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ
£ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. 01£Éà JzÀÄgÀÄzÁgÀgÀ «zÉñÀPÉÌAzÀÄ vÉgÀ¼ÀĪÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß £À£ÀUÉ
«¸ÀªÀ£ÀÄß vÀAiÀiÁj¹PÉÆnÖzÀÝgÀÄ DzÀgÀÆ £Á£ÀÄ CªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ ºÉÆÃVgÀĪÀÅ¢®è
JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. CªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ £Á£ÀÄ
«zÉɱÀÃPÉÌ ºÉÆÃUÀzÉ ¸ÀļÀÄî ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¹gÀÄwÛÃgÁ JAzÀÄ ¸ÀÆa¹zÀgÉ
¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ. ¸ÀzÀj ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¸À®Ä
AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉà CºÀðvÉAiÀÄÆ EgÀ¢zÀÝgÀÆ ¸ÀºÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀtªÀ£ÀÄß zÁR°¹gÀÄwÛÃgÁ
JAzÀgÉ ¸ÁQëAiÀÄÄ ¸ÀļÀÄî JAzÀÄ £ÀÄrAiÀÄÄvÁÛgÉ.

11. On perusal of these depositions it is clear that relationship
between the petitioners and 1st respondent is not in dispute.
The petitioner has failed to prove the 1st respondent has
harassed them. However no specific allegations are being
made against the respondents so as to prove the act of
Domestic Violence. Mere allegations which are not specific and
which are vague in nature cannot be accepted as proof of
Domestic Violence.

12. The petitioner in her cross-examination by the learned counsel
for the respondent she has admitted that she do not
remember for how many days she has stayed with her
husband in the matrimonial home from the day of marriage.
Further she has denied that she has stayed in the said
20 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

matrimonial home for the period of one week. She has
admitted that in the year 2008 she has completed her
graduation. Immediate after her graduation she joined
company by name SAP Lab and was earning Rs.50,000/- p.m.
Presently she is not working anywhere. She has deposed that
if she had continued in the said job she would have earned
more than the salary which she was earning earlier.

13. Further in her cross-examination she has admitted herself
and respondent No.1 do not have any children born out of
their wedlock. Her marriage with respondent No.1 is not
consummated. Further she do not remember when and on
what day the respondents had harassed and tortured her.
Further she has deposed that for the period of 21 days in total
she has stayed in the matrimonial home.

14. When such being the case, the infliction of domestic violence
made against the respondents gets diluted and same cannot
be accepted. The Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act 2005 is beneficiary legislation and is intended to
protect the interest of wife. In order to claim any relief under
the said Act, must satisfy and prove before this Court that she
is an aggrieved woman U/s.2(a) of the said Act and she has
been subjected to domestic violence as defined U/s.3 of
Domestic violence Act. Hence on perusal of the evidence of
P.W.1 it establishes that except the vague allegations made
against the respondent No.1, the petitioner has not proved her
case of domestic violence against him.

21 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

15. The learned counsel for the respondent has filed two citations
on the behalf of respondent. They reads as follows:

16. I (2013) DMC 774 Allahabad High Court, Vikas Pandey Vs.
Vandita Gautam, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 –
Section 18 – Maintenance – Disentitlement of wife – Wife is
highly educated particularly more than the husband and
clearly in a position to earn more – Section 18 of Act deals
with the situation where wife is unable to maintain herself –
Plaintiff – respondent not entitled to any maintenance –
Decree of maintenance awarded by Trial Court set aside.

17. Their lordship in para 18 and 19 of said citation opined that
“So far as the merit of the appeal is concerned the appellant
has proved by documentary evidence that the plaintiff –
respondent being a highly educated lady and engaged as
lecturer in different colleges at different time, was receiving
salary much more than the appellant. The Bombay High Court
has also held that the wife is not entitled to maintenance
when it was clearly established that the income of the wife
was better than the husband. It is also important to mention
here that section 18 of the Act or Section 25 of the Hindu
Marriage Act deals with the situation where the wife is unable
to maintain herself. The word ‘unable’ means that a person is
not able to do what he is supposed to do. In the present
matter, it is not a case that the wife is an illiterate lady or is
not in a position to do any job, on the contrary the wife is
highly educated particularly more than the husband and is
clearly in a position to earn more. This also disentitles her to
get any maintenance.”

22 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

18. II (2000) DMC 170 Madhya Pradesh High Court, Smt. Mamta
Jaiswal Vs. Rajesh Jaiswal. Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 –
Section – 24 – Pendente Lite Alimony : Purpose of Enactment :
Not Meant for Supporting Idle (Qualified) Spouses Waiting for
‘Dole’ to be Awarded by Her Husband – Section 24 has been
enacted for purpose of providing monetary assistance to such
spouse who is incapable of supporting himself / herself in
spite of sincere efforts – Spouse well qualified to get service
immediately with less efforts is not expected to remain idle to
squeeze out his / her purse by cut in nature of pendent elite
alimony – Wife well qualified woman possessing qualification
like M.Sc., M.C. M.Ed. – How can such a lady remain without
service – Lady who is fighting matrimonial petition filed for
divorce, cannot be permitted to sit idle and put her burden on
husband for demanding pendente lite alimony from him
during pendency of matrimonial petition – Amount of Rs.800/-
p.m. awarded to wife as pendent elite alimony not challenged
by husband – No variation or modification is necessary –
Directions issued to Matrimonial court and husband.

19. Their lordship in para 6, 8 and 9 of said citation opined that
“In Fact, well qualified spouses desirous of remaining idle, not
making efforts for the purpose of finding out a source of
livelihood, have to be discouraged, if the society wants to
progress. The spouses who are quarrelling and coming to the
Court in respect of matrimonial disputes, have to be guided for
the purpose of amicable settlement as early as possible and,
therefore, grant of luxurious, excessive facilities by way of
pendente lite alimony and extra expenditure has to be
23 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

discouraged. Even then, if the spouses do not think of
amicable settlement, the Matrimonial courts should dispose of
the matrimonial petitions as early as possible. The
matrimonial courts have to keep it in mind that the quarrels
between the spouses create dangerous impact on minds of
their off springs of such wedlocks. The off springs do not
understand as to where they should see ? towards father or
towards mother ? By seeing them both fighting, making
allegations against each other, they get bewildered. Such
bewilderedness and loss of affection of parents is likely to
create a trauma on their minds and brains. This frustration
amongst children of tender ages is likely to create
complications which would ruin their future. They cannot be
exposed to such danger on account of such fighting parents.

20. In the present case the husband has not challenged the order.
Therefore, no variation or modification in it is necessary
though this revision petition stands dismissed. The
Matrimonial Court is hereby directed to decide the
matrimonial petition which is pending amongst these two
spouses as early as possible. The Matrimonial Court is
directed to submit month wise report about the progress of the
said matrimonial petition to his court so as to secure
continuous, unobstructed progress of matrimonial petition. No
order as to costs. The amount of pendente lite alimony
payable to Mamta Jaiswal by husband Rajesh Jaiswal should
be deposited by him within a month by counting the date from
the date of order. The failure on this aspect would result in
dismissal of this matrimonial petition. He should continue
payment of Rs.400/- p.m. to his daughter Ku. Diksha Jaiswal
right from the date of presentation of application of her
24 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

maintenance i.e., 14-05-1998. That has to be also deposited
within a month. He may take out sufficient money for that
from his savings or take a loan from some good concern or
loan granting agencies. Failure in this aspect also would
result in dismissal of his petition C.C.”

21. On perusal of above citations and applying for the same
formula to the present case this court is of the opinion that
the present petitioner is highly educated and clearly is in a
position to earn more than the respondent No.1 husband. In
the present case the petitioner is able to do what she is
supposed to do being highly educated and is in a position to
earn more than her husband i.e., respondent No.1 this
disentitles petitioner to get any maintenance from her
husband respondent No.1. Further before marriage petitioner
was earning more than the salary which the husband
respondent No.1 is earning now. Only for seeking
maintenance against the husband respondent No.1 the
petitioner has quitted the job and has come before this court
seeking for maintenance and other monetary reliefs. On
perusal of pleadings, depositions, and available materials on
record this court comes to the conclusion that the petitioner
has not approached this court with clean hands.

22. The petitioner has prayed for a protection order U/s.18 of Act.
As discussed above the petitioner has failed to prove the fact
of Domestic Violence by the respondent on her. Such being
the case, this court cannot grant relief under the Sec 18 of the
Act. A part from the self serving statements in the petition
25 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

and her chief examination affidavit, the petitioner has failed to
substantiate by producing cogent documents or iota evidence
to prove her case. Thus she is not entitled for the relief
U/s.18 of PWDV Act.

23. The petitioner has prayed for a direction against the
respondent to provide an alternative residence as per Sec 19
of the Domestic Violence Act. As discussed above the
petitioner has failed to prove the fact of Domestic Violence by
the respondent on her. Such being the case, this court cannot
grant relief under the Sec 19 of the Act. A part from the self
serving statements in the petition and her chief examination
affidavit, the petitioner has failed to substantiate by producing
cogent documents or iota evidence to prove her case. Thus she
is not entitled for the relief U/s.19 of PWDV Act.

24. The petitioner has sought for monetary relief of an amount of
Rs.90,00,000/- as compensation and Rs.40,000/- per month
as maintenance and Rs.30,000/- towards litigation expenses.
Since, the act of Domestic violence is not specifically proved
before the Court, granting of monetary relief would be
inappropriate. Hence, the said relief is liable to be declined.
Hence on careful perusal of the pleadings and documents
before this Court and for the above discussions, I answer
Point No.1 IN THE NEGATIVE.

25. POINT No.2: In view of the materials placed before this court,
pleadings, deposition and documentary evidence this court
proceeds to pass the following:

26 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

ORDER
The petition filed by the petitioner
U/s.12 of Protection of Women from
Domestic Violence Act 2005, is hereby
dismissed.

No order as to costs.
Office is directed to furnish copy of
this order to both the parties at free of
cost.

(Dictated to the Stenographer directly on computer, typed by
her, corrected and then pronounced by me in the open Court
this the 18th day of December 2017).

(GAYATHRI.S.KATE)
MMTC – IV, BANGALORE.

ANNEXURE

1) LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR THE PETITIONER:
P.W.1: Smt. Shwetha K.S.

2) LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR THE PETITIONER:

Ex.P.1: Marriage photo
Ex.P.2: C.D.

Ex.P.3: Marriage invitation’
Ex.P.4: Marriage certificate
Ex.P.5: to 10: Receipts
Ex.P.11: Notice
Ex.P.12: Complaint dt.18-09-2013
Ex.P.13 and 14: Statements
Ex.P.15: Statement dt.28-10-2013
Ex.P.16: Draft condition
Ex.P.17: Counseling notice
Ex.P.18: 3 Page document in Marati Language
Ex.P.18(a): Translation copy
Ex.P.19: City Industrial Development Corporation
Maharashtra 12 page document
Ex.P.19(a): Translation copy
Ex.P.20: 5 page Internet profile document
Ex.P.21: Agreement of sale
27 Crl.Misc.No.228/2013

3) LIST OF WITNESSES EXAMINED FOR THE RESPONDENT:
R.W.1: Srinvias H.V.

R.W.2: Dayanada
R.W.3: Venkappa
R.W.4: Lingaraju

4) LIST OF DOCUMENTS MARKED FOR THE RESPONDENT:

Ex.R.1: Foreign exchange receipt
Ex.R.2: Jinwoo SMC Co., Ltd., Letter dt.07-12-2015
Ex.R.3: Letter of notice dt.07-12-2015 Jinwoo SMC Co., Ltd.,
Ex.R.4: Dt.05-07-2017 EMS postal cover
Ex.R.5: Dt.22-06-2017 certificate of employment
Ex.R.6: Amount deposit on online HDFC Bank document
Ex.R.7: Dt.13/2017 HDFC document
Ex.R.8: Two marriage photo dt.14-01-2014 letter,
Syndicate Bank statement , Marriage C.D,
Receipt dt.25-01-2012 and 27-01-2012

(GAYATHRI.S.KATE)
MMTC – IV, BANGALORE.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh