SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sri. Manjunath Balekundri vs Smt. Nandini @ Akshatha D. G. on 20 June, 2018

-1-
MFA No.9160/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE 2018

PRESENT:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.9160/2017 (GW)

BETWEEN:
SRI MANJUNATH BALEKUNDRI
S/O SRI VEERANNA BALEKUNDRI
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
JOB: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE
R/AT NO.51/100, 21ST MAIN
21ST CROSS, NEAR MARUTHI MANDIR
VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU – 560 040 …APPELLANT

(PARTY-IN-PERSON)

AND:

SMT.NANDINI @ AKSHATHA D.G
D/O SRI D.P.GANGADHAR
DIVORCED WIFE OF SRI MANJUNATH BALEKUNDRI
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
NO.97, SHANTHALA NILAYA, 8TH CROSS
‘A’ BLOCK, DEVARAJ URS LAYOUT
DAVANAGERE – 577 001 …RESPONDENT

(BY SRI BASAVARAJ GODACHI AND
SRI BASAVARAJA PATEL, ADVOCATES)

THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 47(a)
OF THE GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT, 1890 PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.10.2017 (ANNEXURE-A) IN
-2-
MFA No.9160/2017

G WC.NO.187/2017 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY
COURT, BENGALURU.

THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ADMISSION, THIS DAY, H.G.RAMESH J., DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral):

1. This appeal is directed against the order dated

27.10.2017 passed in G WC No.187/2017 by the Principal

Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru.

2. We have heard the appellant, who appeared in person

and perused the record.

3. By the impugned order, the trial Court at Bengaluru

has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant for custody

of his minor son by name Ganesh on the ground that it had

no jurisdiction to entertain the petition as the child, whose

custody was sought for, was admittedly residing with the

respondent at Davanagere.

4. We find no error in the impugned order to warrant

interference in appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
-3-

MFA No.9160/2017

In view of dismissal of the appeal, I.A.No.1/2018 does not

survive for consideration; it stands disposed of accordingly.

Appeal dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE
CT-NR
Ksm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation