SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sri Paparam Shetty vs State Of Karnataka on 1 September, 2017

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2017

BEFORE:

THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA

CRIMINAL PETITION No.5784/2017

BETWEEN:

1.SRI PAPARAM SHETTY
S/O LATE PADMANABHASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/O `SAMRIDHI’
KHB COLONY
SHAKTHINAGAR
PADAV
MANGALURU-575 005

2.SMT LEELAVATHI P SHETTY
W/O PAPARAM SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/O `SAMRIDHI’
KHB COLONY
SHAKTHINAGAR
PADAV
MANGALURU-575 005

3.SMT SAPNA
W/O MAHENDRA SHETTY
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
R/O MANJUNATHAKRUPA
NEELAVARA MADHYASTARA BETTU
NEAR MAHISHAMARDINI TEMPLE
2

BRAMHAVAR
UDUPI -575005 ..PETITIONERS

(BY SRI VISHWAJITH SHETTY S., ADVOCATE)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA
MOODABIDRI POLICE STATION
REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS
BENGALURU-560 001 ..RESPONDENT

(BY CHETAN DESAI, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.438 OF
CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONERS PRAYING
THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE
THE PETITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR
ARREST IN CR.NO.309/2016 (C.C.NO.91/2017) OF
MOODABIDRE P.S., MANGALORE CITY FOR THE OFFENCE
P/U/S 498A,452,504,506,323 R/W 34 OF IPC AND
SECTIONS 3, 4 OF D.P ACT.

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

These petitioners are charge sheeted by the police in

respect of the offence punishable under Sections 498A,

452, 504, 506, 323 read with Sections 3 and 4 of the

Dowry Prohibition Act.

3

2. Petitioners are the in laws of the complainant, their

bail petition is rejected by the Sessions court on observing

that there is no apprehension of being arrested by the

Investigating officer.

3. The reason assigned by the court below is logical and

judicious. In the charge sheet also they are not shown as

absconding persons. In the given circumstances, it is for

the petitioners to appear before the concerned court and

seek for regular bail.

With this observation, this petition is disposed of.

In the event of petitioners surrendering and moving

for bail, same shall be considered in accordance with law as

expeditiously as possible, by the concerned court.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SBN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation