SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sri. Rajesh Kumar B L vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 July, 2018

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF JULY, 2018

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2018/2015
C/w.
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2989/2016

IN CRL.P.NO.2018/2015:

BETWEEN:

Sri Rajesh Kumar B.L.,
Aged about 38 years,
S/o. Sri A. Bhaskaran,
Kuzhivilathoppu Veedu,
T.C.No.49/745,
Manacadu – P.O.,
Trivandrum – 695 009.
Kerala.
…Petitioner
(By Sri P. Raveendran, Advocate for
Sri M.A. Sebastian, Advocate)

AND:

1. The State of Karnataka,
MICO Layout Police Station,
Rep. by SPP,
High Court Building
Bangalore City – 560 001.
2

2. Smt. Sandhya M.Y.,
Aged about 31 years,
W/o. Sri Rajesh Kumar B.L.,
D/o. Sri N. Yesodharan,
Country Club (Travel Tourism)
No.13, 1st Cross, 1st Main,
Opp: Oracle, Thavarekare Main Road,
S.G. Palaya, Bangalore – 560 029.
Also at: ‘Sree Kottanilayam Veedu’,
Aruvappulam – P.O., – 689 691,
Kozhecherry, Pathanamthitta District,
Kerala. ..Respondents

(By Smt. Namitha Mahesh B.G, HCGP for R-1,
By Sri Pavan Kumar G., Advocate for
Sri S. Shankarappa for R-2)

This Criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
praying to quash the proceedings initiated against the
petitioner/accused by the respondent No.1 by registering FIR in
Crime No.296/2014 dated 03.05.2014 as per Annexure-A now
pending in the file of VI ACMM, Bangalore and etc.

IN CRL.P.NO.2989/2016

BETWEEN:

D. Sandhya,
Aged about 31 years,
D/o. Sri Yesodharan,
R/at No.13, 1st Cross, 1st Main Road,
Tavarekere,Sudduguntepalya
Bengaluru – 562 130. …Petitioner

(By Sri Pavan Kumar G., Advocate for
Sri S. Shankarappa, Advocate)
3

AND:

1. The State of Karnataka,
R.T. Nagar Police Station,
Bengaluru – 560 032,
Rep. by SPP,
High Court Complex,
Bangalore City – 560 001.

2. Sri Rajesh Kumar B.L.,
Aged about 38 years,
S/o. Sri Bhaskaran,
R/a Kuzhivilathoppu Veedu,
T.C.No.49/745,
Manacadu – P.O.,
Trivandrum – 695 009,
Kerala. …Respondents

(By Smt. B.G. Namitha Mahesh, HCGP for R-1
Sri P. Raveendan, Advocate for R-2)

This Criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of
Cr.P.C. praying to set aside the cognizance taken by the
order dated 08.07.2015 passed on the file of III ACMM,
Bangalore in C.C.No.16393/2015 for the offence punishable
under Section 143, 323, 326, 504, 506 R/w 149 of IPC by
Madiwala police and proceedings against the petitioner may
be quashed by allowing the petition.

These Criminal petitions coming on for Admission,
this day, the court made the following:
4

ORDER

On behalf of respondent no.2 in Crl.P.No.2989/2016,

Sri P. Raveendran, Advocate is present and undertakes to

enter appearance on behalf of respondent No.2. Counsel is

permitted to file Vakalath in the Registry.

2. Both these petitions are filed under Section 482

of Cr.P.C. The petitioners in both the cases are husband

and wife. The wife- Smt. Sandhya M.Y., lodged a complaint

against her husband- Sri Rajesh Kumar B.L., which has

culminated in filing a charge sheet for the offences

punishable under Section 498A, 506, 323, 326 and 504 of

IPC.

3. Now both the parties have filed a joint memo duly

signed by them and their respective counsels stating that in

view of the settlement arrived at between them in the Family

Court at Pathanamthitta, Kerala on 30.04.2018, both the

parties have withdrawn the allegations made against each

other. The parties have also moved a joint petition before
5

the Family Court for dissolution of their marriage. The

parties have also stated that they have put an end to their

inter-se disputes by entering into the aforesaid settlement

out of free Will and volition and without any force or

coercion.

4. In terms of the joint memo, the parties have

requested this court to quash the proceedings initiated

against both of them.

5. Considering the said compromise which does not

offend any provision of law and there being no legal

impediment to accept the same, the joint memo filed by the

parties which is duly supported by the affidavits sworn to by

them, is accepted.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition No.2018/2015 and

Criminal Petition No.2989/2016 are allowed. The

proceedings against Sri Rajesh Kumar B.L. in

C.C.No.16393/2015 pending on the file of III Addl. CMM,
6

Bangalore and against Smt.Sandhya M.Y. in

C.C.No.9583/2016 pending on the file of VI Addl. CMM are

hereby quashed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sk/PN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation