SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sri Subhas Chandra Maity & Ors vs Unknown on 5 November, 2019





C.R.M. 10114 of 2019

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 22.10.2019 in connection
with Sabang P. S. Case No.373 of 2019 dated 27.08.2019 under
Sections 498A/Section323/Section506/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Sri Subhas Chandra Maity Ors.

… Petitioners.

Mr. Pradip Paul.

…for the Petitioners.

Mr. R. Jana.

…..for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there was

matrimonial discord between petitioner no.3 and the de-facto

complainant and the said petitioner No.3 had approached the

appropriate authority for mediation. In retaliation, the criminal

case has been registered against the petitioners.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind the nature of allegations in the light of the aforesaid

submission on behalf of the petitioners that the possibility of

mediation of the dispute cannot be ruled out, we are of the opinion

that the petitioners may be granted anticipatory bail, however,

subject to conditions.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioners viz., Sri Subhas Chandra Maity, Sri Archana Maity, Sri

Abhinandan Maity and Sudipta Maity (Aditya) shall be released on

bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties

of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the

petitioners shall appear before the trial court and pray for regular

bail within four weeks from date and on further condition that the

petitioner no.3 shall meet the investigating officer once in a week

until further orders.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation