M.Cr.C. No.14586/2018 1
Subhash S/o Umrao vs. State of M.P.

HIGH COURT OF M.P. : BENCH AT INDORE
02/05/2018 :-
Shri Virendra Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Government Advocate for
the non-applicant/State.
Heard with the aid of case diary.
ORDER

This is third repeat bail application under Section 439 of
Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No.346/2017 under
Section 376, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station-
Nanakheda, District-Ujjain.

2. First and second bail applications were dismissed as
withdrawn vide orders dated 11/10/2017 and 29/11/2017
passed in M.Cr.C. Nos.9785/2017 and 22936/2017 respectively.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present
applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the
present case. There is no evidence against him. Conclude of
trial is likely to take time. The applicant is permanent resident
of District-Ujjain. There is no possibility of absconding. He is
ready to furnish adequate security, therefore, he may be
released on bail.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor for the State
opposes the bail application and prays for dismissal of the
application.

5. This time the present applicant has come before this
Court with the statement of prosecutrix recorded by the
M.Cr.C. No.14586/2018 2
Subhash S/o Umrao vs. State of M.P.

learned trial Court. Though in her examination-in-chief the
prosecutrix has reiterated her allegation but in the cross-
examination several facts have come on record. Relevant
paras are 4 to 10 which reads thus :-

“04- o”kZ 2011 esa EkSaus mTtSu U;k;ky; esa vkjksih ls dksVZ esfjt dh
Fkh vkSj LVkEi ij fy[kki+h gqbZ FkhA ukuk[ksM+k esa vkjVhvks vkWfQl esa
vkjksih us vkSj eSaus ,d nwljs dks gkj Mkydj QksVksa f[kapok, FksA o”kZ
2011 ls yxkrkj ,dMs+ o”kZ rd eSa vkjksih ds lkFk fookg ds ckn
lkFk jgh FkhA
05- blds iwoZ esjh ‘kknh [kacw[ksMh esa xksfoan ls gqbZ Fkh ftlls eqs 2
cPPks xxu vkSj vuqjkx gq, FksA ;g lgh gS fd tc vkjksih ls o”kZ 2011
esa eSaus dksVZ esjht dh Fkh rc mudh vk;q 9 o 7 o”kZ FkhA vkjksih ls
esjk ifjp; o”kZ 2011 esa dksVZ dsl pyrs jgus ds nkSjku gqvk FkkA dksVZ
esa vkjksih ls o”kZ 2011 esa izse fookg djus ds nkSjku eSa vkjksih ds
lkFk ,d Ms+ ?kaVs rd dksVZ esa jgh FkhA mDr fy[kki+h eSaus vkjksih ls
izse gksus ds dkj.k eafnj esa tkdj fookg djus dh fy[kki+h fnukad 12-
05-2011 dks dh FkhA eSa vkjksih ds ?kj ij o”kZ 2011 ds ckn ls vkrh
tkrh jgh gwWA fQj dgk vkjksih esjs ?kj ij vkrk FkkA vkjksih esjs ?kj
xzke rjkuk ds [kacw[ksMh xkao esa vkrk tkrk jgrk FkkA
06- o”kZ 2017 esa esjs }kjk tks cykRdkj dh ckr crkbZ gS mDr ?kVuk
ijes’ojh xkMZu esa gqbZ Fkh ftlesa eSa vkjksih ds lkFk eksVjlkbZdy ls 2
ckj mTtSu dksBh ls xbZ FkhA eSa ,d ckj ‘kke dks 4 cts vkSj nwljh
ckj ‘kke dks 6 cts vkjksih ds lkFk eksVjlkbZdy ls mTtSu dksBh ls
xbZ FkhA o”kZ 2011 esa tc esjh vkjksih ls ‘kknh gqbZ Fkh rc esjh vk;w 32
o”kZ ds yxHkx FkhA esjs igys ifr dh e`R;w chekjh ls yxHkx 5 o”kZ iwoZ
gks xbZ gSA vkjksih ls tc eSaus izse fookg fd;k Fkk ml le; esjs iwoZ
ifr thfor FksA
07- ftl ijes’ojh xkMZu esa eSa vkjksih ds lkFk xbZ Fkh mlesa 2 dejs
Fks] ,d dejs esa ckdh ds yksx jgrs FksA ml dejs esa ,d yM+dk] mldh
ekW vkSj 4 NksVsNksVs cPPks Hkh jgrs FksA jkr Hkj ge yksx mlh dejs esa
#ds FksA lqcg mBus ij eSaus ?kj dk fu;fer dk;Z] pk; cukuk vkfn
lHkh dk;Z fd, FksA
08- vkjksih tc esjs ?kj rjkuk vk;k Fkk rc jkr esa ugha #dk FkkA
vkjksih tc geus dksVZ esa ‘kknh dh fy[kki+h gqbZ Fkh mlds dkQh le;
ckn rjkuk vk;k FkkA esjs nksuksa cPPks esjs lkFk esa gh jgrs gS ftuds uke
vuqjkx mez 8 o”kZ vkSj xxu mez 11 o”kZ gSA nksuksa cPPks lenkj gS
vkSj Ldwy tkrs gSA
09- esjs ifjokj esa esjs ekrkfirk ugha gS fdarq esjs nks tsB gS tks
eqls vyx jgrs gSaA eSaus o”kZ 2011 esa tks vkjksih ls fy[kki+h dj dksVZ
esjht dh Fkh mldh dksbZ tkudkjh vius tsB] tsBkuh dks ugha nh FkhA
esjs ek;dsa esa esjh nks cgusa] HkkbZ gSA o”kZ 2011 esa vkjksih ls tks eSaus dksVZ
esjht dh Fkh mldh tkudkjh eSaus vius HkkbZ cgu dks Hkh ugha nh FkhA
M.Cr.C. No.14586/2018 3
Subhash S/o Umrao vs. State of M.P.

10- ;g dguk lgh gS fd dksVZ esa vkjksih ls ifjp; gksus ds ckn
ge yksx vkil esa Qksu ij Hkh ckrphr djrs FksA nsoklxsV cl LVs’ku
ij Hkh tc eSa mrjrh Fkh rks vkjksih ds lkFk esa tkrh FkhA ml le; Hkh
cl LVs’ku ls eSa vkjksih ds lkFk eksVjlkbZfdy ls gh vkrh tkrh
FkhA ;g dguk lgh gS fd] cl LVs’ku] mTtSu dksVZ ifjlj] ijes’ojh
xkMZu ds vklikl dk ,fj;k lHkh HkhM+ okys bykds gS rFkk ogka turk
rFkk iqfyl jgrh gSA^^

6. The witnesses – Arjun Rathore and Mahesh Rathore who
have produced by the prosecution to prove that the present
applicant had uploaded the video on you-tube have turned
hostile.

7. The accused is in custody from 02/08/2017.
Investigation is over and charge sheet has already been filed.
Trial is likely to take time.

8. In view of the aforesaid and other facts and
circumstances of the case coupled with the period of
detention, I deem it proper to release the accused/applicant
on bail. Therefore, without commenting on merits of the case,
the application is allowed.

9. It is directed that the applicant Subhash S/o Umrao
be released from custody on his furnishing a personal bond in
the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only)
with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction
of the Trial Court for his appearance before the Trial Court as
and when required further subject to the following
conditions :-

(i) The applicant shall co-operate with the trial
and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments on
frivolous grounds to protract the trial;

M.Cr.C. No.14586/2018 4

Subhash S/o Umrao vs. State of M.P.

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly
allure or make any inducement, threat or promise
to the prosecution witnesses, so as to dissuade
him from disclosing truth before the Court;

(iii) The applicant shall not commit any offence
or involve in any criminal activity;

(iv) In case of his involvement in any other
criminal activity or breach of any other aforesaid
conditions, the bail granted in this case may also
be cancelled.

C.C. as per rules.

(Virender Singh)
Judge
Aiyer*

Digitally signed by
Jagdishan Aiyer
Date: 2018.05.02
18:05:00 +05’30’