CRM 8819 of 2019
In Re: – An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 17.09.2019 in connection with
Anandapur P.S. Case No. 118 dated 12.05.2019 under Sections
120B/Section498A/Section304B/Section306/Section406/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.
In the matter of: Subhranshu Roy
Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya,
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Tanmay Kr. Ghosh,
Mr. Arindam Sen
…for the State.
Mr. Shamik Bagchi,
Mr. Arun Shau
…for the de facto complainant.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of
torture on demand of dowry are out and out false and he is in
custody for about 120 days and the investigation is complete.
Learned lawyer for the State and de facto complainant also
opposes the prayer for bail.
Having considered the materials on record and keeping in
mind the nature of allegations in the light of the fact that the victim
housewife had committed suicide at her brother’s place and in view
of the period of detention suffered by the petitioner and as the
investigation is complete, we are inclined to grant bail to the
Let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond
of Rs. 10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom
must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24-Parganas subject to the
condition that during bail the petitioner shall appear before the
learned trial court regularly till disposal of the trial and the petitioner
shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any
In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions
as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the
bail without any further reference to this Court.
The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)