SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Subhranshu Roy vs Unknown on 19 September, 2019

1

19.09.2019

SL No.311
AP
CRM 8819 of 2019
In Re: – An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 17.09.2019 in connection with
Anandapur P.S. Case No. 118 dated 12.05.2019 under Sections
120B/Section498A/Section304B/Section306/Section406/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code and
Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.

And

In the matter of: Subhranshu Roy
….Petitioner.

Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya,
…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Tanmay Kr. Ghosh,
Mr. Arindam Sen
…for the State.

Mr. Shamik Bagchi,
Mr. Arun Shau
…for the de facto complainant.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation of

torture on demand of dowry are out and out false and he is in

custody for about 120 days and the investigation is complete.

Learned lawyer for the State and de facto complainant also

opposes the prayer for bail.

Having considered the materials on record and keeping in

mind the nature of allegations in the light of the fact that the victim

housewife had committed suicide at her brother’s place and in view

of the period of detention suffered by the petitioner and as the

investigation is complete, we are inclined to grant bail to the

petitioner.

2

Let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond

of Rs. 10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom

must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24-Parganas subject to the

condition that during bail the petitioner shall appear before the

learned trial court regularly till disposal of the trial and the petitioner

shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any

manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions

as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the

bail without any further reference to this Court.

The application for bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation