SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sudevan vs State Of Kerala on 1 July, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR

MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF JULY 2019 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.4663 of 2019

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 2469/2019 of JUDICIAL
FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, KADAKKAL DATED 12-06-2019

CRIME NO.355/2019 OF Kadakkal Police Station , Kollam

PETITIONER/S:

SUDEVAN
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O.BALAKRISHNACHARY, SUDHEESH BHAVAN,
KUSHAVOORKONAM, OONNANKALLU, KUMMIL.P.O, KOLLAM
DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.ANOOP (MULAVANA)

RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA-682031

OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.V.SREEJA,PP

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
01.07.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Case No. BA 4663/19

-2-

ORDER

The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.355 of 2019
of Kadakkal Police Station registered for the offence
punishable under Section 377 IPC.

2. The petitioner was arrested on 11.6.2019 and ever
since he has been in custody.

3. Heard.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the
petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It appears that the
major part of the investigation is almost complete.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
including the stage of investigation and also taking into
consideration of the fact that the petitioner is a first time
offender, I am inclined to allow this bail application.

In the result, this application stands allowed and the
petitioner shall be released on bail on condition of the
petitioner executing a bond for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees thirty
thousand only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like
Case No. BA 4663/19

-3-

sum to the satisfaction of the Jurisdictional Magistrate and
subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall report before the
Investigating Officer on every Monday between
9 a.m. and 11 a.m. for three months and thereafter,
as and when required by the Investigating Officer
for interrogation.

(ii) The petitioner shall not get involved in any
offence during the pendency of this case.

(iii) The petitioner shall not intimidate or
influence the witnesses or in any way tamper with
the investigation.

Sd/-B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR,
JUDGE.

dl/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation