SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sudhanshu Gupta @ Sonu vs The State Of Bihar Through … on 20 April, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.259 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PATNA

1. Sudhanshu Gupta @ Sudhanshu Kumar Gupta @ Sonu Son of Naresh Prasad
Gupta permanent residence of Mithila Colony P.S. Danapur, Patna.

…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department Bihar.

2. Smt. Juli Kumari wife of Sudhanshu Gupta @ Sonu, Daughter of Shri Arun
Prasad Gupta Navgachhiya Bazar, Purani Sabzi Patti, P.S. Navgachhiya, District
Bhagalpur.

…. …. Respondent/s

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Narayan Brahmchari
For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma, A.A.G.3

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 20-04-2018

By filing a supplementary affidavit, the petitioner

has now brought on record the order taking cognizance which

was passed as back as on 10.10.2013. It appears that after

recording the statement on oath of the complainant and the

enquiry witnesses, the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial

Magistrate, Danapur took cognizance of the offences under

Section 498A, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and finding

sufficient materials on the record to proceed against the

accused persons, summons were issued against them.

On perusal of the complaint petition as also the

statements made in course of enquiry under Section 202
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.259 of 2018 dt.20-04-2018 2

Cr.P.C., I do not find any reason to interfere with the order

taking cognizance. At this stage, the learned counsel

representing the petitioner has also informed this court that the

petitioner had earlier filed an application for his discharge

before the court below which has also been rejected and the

said order is not under challenge. That would create another

reason not to interfere with the order taking cognizance in the

interest of justice.

This writ application is disposed off, accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J.)
Rajeev/-

AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 24.04.2018
Transmission Date 24.04.2018

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation