SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sudhir And 3 Ors vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 14 October, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 70

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 22575 of 2019

Applicant :- Sudhir And 3 Ors

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr

Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/opposite party no.1 and perused the record with the assistance of learned counsel for the parties.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the charge-sheet No. 347 of 2018 dated 07.07.2018 arising out of Case Crime No.0249 of 2018, under Sectionsections 498A, Section323, Section504, Section506 I.P.C. SectionDowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Inchauli, District ? Meerut, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.9, Meerut.

It is pointed out by the learned counsel for the applicants that vide order dated 12.06.2019, matter was referred to Mediation on the request of learned counsel for the applicants subject to deposit of Rs.20,000/- within 15 days, but the said amount has not been deposited by the applicants.

After advancing certain arguments at length by learned counsel for the applicants, when the Court put certain query to him, he gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge-sheet No.347 of 2018 dated 07.07.2018 against the applicants and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicants to surrender before the concerned court below. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously in accordance with law.

In view of above, the relief as sought by the applicants in the instant application is refused.

Considering the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that in case applicants appear before the concerned court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, the bail application of the applicants shall be heard and disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law keeping in view of the Seven Judges’ decision of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2005 Criminal Law Journal 755 as well as judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. (2009) 4 Supreme Court Cases, 437.

For the period of 45 days from today or till the date of appearance of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the above case.

With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.

Order Date :- 14.10.2019

SKD

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation