SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Suja vs State Of Kerala on 9 November, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

FRIDAY,THE 09TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 18TH KARTHIKA, 1940

Crl.MC.No. 7570 of 2018

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN LP 29/2016 ON THE FILES OF
J.M.F.C.-I, PERINTHALMANNA

CRIME NO.740/2010 OF Perinthalmanna Police Station, Malappuram

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 3:

1 SUJA, AGED 40 YEARS,
W/O SIVAPRASAD, AMBALAVATTA(H), THRIKKALLOOR P O,
THACHAMPARA, MANNARKKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678590

2 JANAKI, AGED 63 YEARS,
W/O MANU, AMBALAVATTA (H), THRIKKALLOOR P.O.,
THACHAMPARA, MANNARKKADU, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678590.

BY ADVS.
SMT.V.H.JASMINE
SMT.K.P.SURYA
SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE

RESPONDENT/STATE:
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN-682031

OTHER PRESENT:
SRI. C K PRASAD-PP

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
09.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.M.C. 7570/18 2

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The petitioners herein are the accused Nos.2 and 3 in L.P.

No.29 of 2016 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate

Court-I, Perinthalmanna. The aforesaid case has arisen from Crime

No.740 of 2010 registered at the Perinthalmanna Police Station

under Section 498A r/w. Section 34 of the IPC.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

contended that the petitioners, who are the sister and mother

respectively of the 1st accused, were not served with any summons.

It is prayed that an opportunity be granted to them to appear before

the court below and seek bail.

4. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor and I have gone

through the materials on record. Having regard to the facts and

circumstances, I direct the petitioners to surrender before the

jurisdictional court within a period of ten days from today. If an

application for recall of warrant and bail is preferred, with advance
Crl.M.C. 7570/18 3

notice to the concerned Prosecutor, the same shall be considered

and orders shall be passed expeditiously and on its merits, ideally on

the same day itself.

This petition is disposed of as above.

SD/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.,

JUDGE

KRJ //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh