1

16.12.2019

.

98.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 11848 of 2019

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 27.11.2019 in connection
with Bhagwangola P. S. Case No.439 of 2019 dated 24.08.2018
under Sections 498A/Section304B/Section302/Section120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Suklema Bibi @ Muklema Bibi.

… Petitioner.

Mr. Debapriya Samanta.

…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy.

…..for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she is a

relation of the husband of the victim housewife and has been

falsely implicated in the instant case. Co-accused person, Halim

Sk., brother-in-law of the victim housewife has been granted pre-

arrest bail. Petitioner claims parity with the said co-accused

person.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and in view of the

extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime and as

the co-accused person viz., Halim sk. similarly circumstanced
2

with the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail, we are

inclined to extend the same privilege also to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of

Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the

satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as

laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear

before the trial court and pray for regular bail within four weeks

from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Suvra Ghosh,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)