SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sukumaran Nair vs State Of Kerala on 27 September, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS

FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 5TH ASWINA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.6687 OF 2019

CRIME NO.813/2019 OF THEKKUMBHAGOM POLICE STATION ,
Kollam

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 TO 5:

1 SUKUMARAN NAIR, AGED 70 YEARS
PUNTHALA VEEDU, MALI BHAGOM, CHAVARA SOUTH,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 584.

2 JAGADAMMA, AGED 65 YEARS
W/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, PUNTHALA VEEDU,
MALI BHAGOM, CHAVARA SOUTH,
KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 584.

3 SREEKUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS
S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, PUNTHALA VEEDU, MALI
BHAGOM, CHAVARA SOUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691
584.

4 GIREESH KUMAR, AGED 34 YEARS
S/O.SUKUMARAN NAIR, PUNTHALA VEEDU, MALI
BHAGOM, CHAVARA SOUTH, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691
584.

BY ADVS.
SRI.M.KIRANLAL
SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN
SRI.T.S.SARATH
SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA)
AJAY JAYACHANDRAN
Bail Appl..No.6687 OF 2019

..2..

RESPONDENT:

STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

OTHER PRESENT:

SRI.B.JAYASURYA, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 27.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.6687 OF 2019

..3..

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
————————————-
B.A. No. 6687 of 2019
————————————-
Dated this the 27th day of September, 2019

ORDER

The petitioners herein seek grant of anticipatory bail in

relation to Crime No. 813 of 2019 of the Chavara Thekkumbhagom

Police Station, which has been registered for offences punishable

under Sections 406, 420, 354C, 377, 498A, 500 and 506 read with

Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and under Sections 66E and

Section67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Initially, five

persons have been arrayed as accused in the above said crime. The

petitioners herein are accused Nos. 2 to 5 in the said crime.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor Sri. B. Jayasurya

would submit on the basis of instructions from the Investigating

Officer concerned that the Police, after investigation, has deleted

many of the offences and has also deleted the petitioners herein

(accused Nos. 2 to 5) from the accused array and presently,

accused No.1 is the sole accused in the above said crime, and the
Bail Appl..No.6687 OF 2019

..4..

offences are those under Sections Sections 406, Section420, Section354C, Section498A,

Section500 and Section506 of IPC. Accordingly, it is submitted by the learned

Public Prosecutor that since all the four petitioners herein have

been deleted from the accused array, and a report in that regard

has also been submitted by the Investigating Officer before the

competent criminal court concerned, the apprehension of the

petitioners that they will be arrested in the above said crime, is

unfounded, and the application has become infructuous.

Recording the above said submission of the Public

Prosecutor, it is ordered that the above anticipatory bail

application will stand dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

ALEXANDER THOMAS,
JUDGE

ds 27.09.2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation