SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sulochna Kallappa Bandiwadar And … vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 June, 2019

1/327-ABA-706-19withAPPP566-19.odt

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY
CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORYBAILAPPLICATIONNO.706OF2019

SulochanaKallappaBandiwadarAnr…..Applicants
versus
TheStateofMaharashtra….Respondent
WITH
CRIMINALAPPLICATIONNO.566OF2019
IN
ANTICIPATORYBAILAPPLICATIONNO.706OF2019
AnandShankarShinde….Applicant/Intervener
Inthematterbetween3.00p.m
SulochanaKallappaBandiwadarAnr…..Applicants
versus
TheStateofMaharashtra….Respondent
…….

•Mr.VikrantV.Phatate,AdvocateforApplicant.
•Mr.RamdasH.PatilforIntervener.
•Mr.PrashantJadhav,APPforstate.

CORAM:SARANGV.KOTWAL,J.
DATE:10thJUNE,2019

P.C.:

1.TheApplicantsareseekinganticipatorybailin

connectionwithC.R.No.I09of2019registeredwithMandrup

PoliceStation,undersections498Ar/w.34SectionoftheIndianPenal

Code.

V.B.GOKHALE

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:31:::
2/327-ABA-706-19withAPPP566-19.odt

2.TheF.I.R.islodgedon12/01/2019basedonthe

statementgivenbythedeceasedKarishmaBandiwadkar.The

statementwasrecordedasdyingdeclaration.Thedeceased

succumbedtoherinjurieson17/01/2019.Thedyingdeclaration

wasrecordedbyPSI,MandrupPolicestation.Shehasstatedthat

shegotmarriedninemonthspriortotheincident.Shewas

continuouslyharassedbypresentapplicants.Theapplicantsare

motherinlawandsisterinlawofthedeceased.Becauseoftheir

harassmentshehadcommittedsuicide.

3.TheallegationsintheF.I.R.arevague.Theallegations

donotpointoutthattheharassmentwasofsuchanaturewhich

wouldattractdefinitionofcrueltyU/s.498AofSectionI.P.C.orabettment

asdefinedinS.107ofSectionI.P.C.forthepurposeofattractingS.306of

SectionI.P.C.Moreover,dyingdeclarationisrecordedinthepresenceof

Karishma’sfather.Consideringalltheseaforementionedfacts,at

thisstage,itisdifficulttoobservethatpresentapplicantshad

abettedcommissionofsuicidebythedeceased.Therefore,inmy

view,theapplicantshavemadeoutacaseforgrantofanticipatory

bail.Thecustodialinterrogationoftheapplicantsisnotnecessary.

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:31:::
3/327-ABA-706-19withAPPP566-19.odt

4.Hence,thefollowingorder:

ORDER

(i)Intheeventoftheirarrestinconnectionwith
C.R.No.I09of2019registeredwithMandrup
PoliceStation,Dist.Solapur,theapplicantsare
directedtobereleasedonbailontheir
furnishingPRbondsinthesumofRs.25,000/-
each(RupeesTwentyFiveThousandOnlyeach)
withoneortwosuretieseachinthelikeamount.

(ii)Applicationstandsdisposedofaccordingly.

(iii)Connectedapplicationforinterventionisalso
disposedof.

(SARANGV.KOTWAL,J.)

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:31:::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation