SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sumit Daga & Ors. vs The State & Anr. on 15 March, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

$~30
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: March 15, 2021

+ CRL.M.C. 864/2021
SUMIT DAGA ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through: Mr. S.L.Jain, Advocate

Versus

THE STATE ANR. …. Respondents
Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma,
Additional Public Prosecutor
for State with SI Shashi
Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

JUDGMENT(ORAL)

%

1. Vide this petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR

No.14/2017, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police

station Roop Nagar, Delhi and all other proceedings arising

therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor

for State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present

in the Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in

Crl.M.C. 864/2021 Page 1 of 3
question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also

present in the Court.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken

up for final hearing and disposal.

5. The marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2

was solemnized on 28.04.2009 and due to temporal differences, the

marriage could not work and they started living separately since

April, 2014. The dispute between the parties culminated into the

FIR in question.

6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the

parties have amicably settled their dispute in terms of Settlement-

Agreement of 14.01.2021 and are living peacefully together.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the sides

have agreed to abide by the terms of Settlement-Agreement of

14.01.2021.

8. Respondent No.2 present in the Court submits that she has no

grievance against the petitioners and to enable her to restore cordial

relations with her husband and in-laws, proceedings arising out of

FIR in question be brought to an end.

Crl.M.C. 864/2021 Page 2 of 3

9. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been

amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in

question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with

the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.

10. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.14/2017, under Sections

498A/406/34 IPC, registered at police station Roop Nagar, Delhi

and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
March 15, 2021
r

Crl.M.C. 864/2021 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation