SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sumit Singh vs The State ( Govt Of Of Delhi) on 22 March, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

$~36
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: March 22, 2021

+ CRL.M.C. 956/2021

SUMIT SINGH ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate
with petitioner in person

Versus

THE STATE ( GOVT OF DELHI) ANR. ….. Respondents
Through: Mr. G.M.Farooqui,
Additional Public Prosecutor
for respondent No.1/State
with SI Harinder Singh
Mr. Deepak Kumar,
Advocate with respondent
No.2 in person

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

%

1. Vide present petition, petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR

No.446/2016, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC Section 4 of

Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at police station Aman Vihar,

Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

Crl.M.C. 956/2021 Page 1 of 3

3. Mr. G.M.Farooqui, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for

State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2 is present in

the Court and she has been identified as the complainant of FIR in

question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also

present in the Court.

4. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken

up for final hearing and disposal.

5. The marriage of petitioner No.1/husband and respondent

No.2/wife was solemnized on 01.07.2014 due to temporal

differences, they started living separately since 28.08.2019. The

dispute between the parties culminated into the FIR in question.

6. The present petition has been filed on the ground that the

parties have amicably settled their dispute vide Settlement

Agreement dated 29.06.2019 reached through Delhi Mediation

Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi and they are happily and

peacefully living together for last 1½ years.

7. Respondent No.2 present in the Court submits that she has no

grievance against the petitioner and to enable her to restore cordial

relations with her husband and in-laws, proceedings arising out of

Crl.M.C. 956/2021 Page 2 of 3
FIR in question be brought to an end.

8. Keeping in view that the dispute between the parties has been

amicably resolved, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR in

question, as no useful purpose would be served in continuing with

the proceedings arising out of the present FIR.

9. For the reasons afore noted, FIR No.446/2016, under Sections

498A/406/34 IPC Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, registered

at police station Aman Vihar, Delhi and consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

10. The petition is accordingly allowed and disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
MARCH 22, 2021
r

Crl.M.C. 956/2021 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation