U/L-2 01.04.2019 C.R.R. 966 of 2019
SB Court 29
In the matter of : Sunil Kumar Ors.
Mr. Abhijit Basu
Mr. Arghya Kamal Das …. For the petitioners
This is an application for quashing of a proceeding where a trial is
going on charges under sections 304, 406, 498A read with section 34
of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition
The learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners
submits as follows. During the trial at the intervention of the common
friends and relatives, a compromise and settlement has been arrived at
between the private parties of all the disputes that had led to the initiation
of the present proceedings. In fact the opposite party no. 2 / wife is
presently staying with the husband / petitioner no. 1. She has recently
delivered a child. Earlier the victim lady along with the other accused had
filed an application for quashing before this Court being C.R.R. 3493 of
2018 on the ground of compromise. Due to presence of some incurable
defects in the said petition the said revisional application was withdrawn.
The present petitioners along with opposite party no. 2 want to file a joint
compromise application praying for quashing of the impugned proceeding
on the ground of settlement and compromise.
Let the petitioners serve a copy of this application upon the State
through the learned Public Prosecutor and upon the opposite party no. 2
by speed post with acknowledgement due, within a week. An affidavit of
service to that effect shall be filed on the next date of hearing.
Let this matter appear under the heading ‘Contested Application’
two weeks hence.
The impugned proceeding shall remain stayed for a period of four
weeks from this date.
Liberty is granted to the parties to pray for extension or
modification or variation or vacating of the interim order upon notice to
the other side.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to
the parties expeditiously, if applied for.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)