SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sunil Kumar Sinha & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 7 April, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33440 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2011 Thana -GARDANIBAGH District- PATNA

1. Sunil Kumar Sinha S/O Suresh Kumar Sinha R/O- Subhadra Sadan, D.V.C.
Colony, P.S.- Gardanibagh, Dist.- Patna

2. Poonam Sinha W/O Sunil Kumar Sinha R/O- Subhadra Sadan, D.V.C. Colony,
P.S.- Gardanibagh, Dist.- Patna
…. …. Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Manisha Sinha W/O Susant Kumar Sinha, D/O Shyam Nanadan Lal R/O-
Nawab Bahadur Road, Choaa Lal Lane, Paschimdarwaja, P.S.- Khajekala,
Dist.- Patna
…. …. Opposite Party/s

Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 07-04-2017

Heard both sides.

The petitioners filed this petition under Section 482 of

the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the order dated 02.07.2013

passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna in G.R. Case No.

3824 of 2011.

The informant alleged in her fardbeyan that she was

married to Sushant Kumar Sinha on 22.11.2009 and at the time of

marriage, cash, different articles and vehicle worth Rs. 35 Lakh were

given to her husband and his family members. After sometime, her

husband and other family members started demanding Rs.15 lakhs

more and for that they subjected her for physical and mental torture.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33440 of 2013 dt.07-04-2017

2/3

The informant also made allegation that the petitioners and other

family members confined her in a room and assaulted her brutally.

The police took up the investigation and after

completion of investigation, the investigating officer submitted a

report finding the case true against the petitioners.

Thereafter, the petitioners filed a petition for their

discharge and after hearing both sides, the learned Sub-Divisional

Judicial Magistrate vide order dated 02.07.2013 rejected the petition

finding sufficient materials against the petitioners to frame charges

under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and

Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners assails the order on

the ground that the petitioners are brother-in-law and sister-in-law of

the informant. The informant has not made any specific allegation of

demand of dowry and torture against the petitioners. The petitioners

have no concern with the family affairs of the informant and her

husband.

Learned counsel for the petitioners in support of his

contention placed reliance on the judgment of the Apex Court in the

case of Preeti Gupta reported in 2010 (4) PLJR 36 (Prity Gupta Vs.

State of Jharkhand) and in the case of Neelu Chopra reported in

(2009) 10 SCC 184 (Neelu Chopra v. Bharti). It is held in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33440 of 2013 dt.07-04-2017

3/3

aforesaid judgments that the informant and other witnesses did not

make any specific allegation against in-laws of the aforesaid case,

therefore, the proceeding against them should be quashed on the

ground that it would be an abuse of process of law.

From perusal of the statement of the informant and the

F.I.R. itself, it appears that the informant has made specific allegation

against the petitioners that the petitioners along with others confined

her in a room and brutally assaulted her due to non-fulfillment of

additional demand of dowry and they drove out her from the house.

During investigations, the witnesses also reiterated the same facts.

I find that there are sufficient materials against the

petitioners and the petitioners are none else than the own brother and

sister-in-law of the husband of the informant. In view of the specific

allegation made against the petitioners, I do not find any illegality in

the order and, accordingly, this quashing petition is dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

Mishra/-

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date
Transmission
Date

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation