SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sunil Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 27 December, 2019

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFKERALAATERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICEN.ANILKUMAR

FRIDAY,THE27THDAYOFDECEMBER2019/6THPOUSHA,1941

BailAppl..No.9283OF2019

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

SUNILKUMAR,
AGED46YEARS,S/O.MADHAVAN,
KOLLAYILKIZHAKKETHIL,
KUNNATHOORWEST,MANAMPUZHAP.O.,
KOLLAMDISTRICT-691553.

BYADVS.

SMT.M.R.JAYALATHA
SRI.R.RENJITH

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE:

1STATEOFKERALA,
REPRESENTEDBYTHEPUBLICPROSECUTOR,
HIGHCOURTOFKERALA,ERNAKULAM.

2SUBINSPECTOROFPOLICE,
SASTHAMKOTTAPOLICESTATION,
SASTHAMKOTTAP.O.,KOLLAM.

3DISTRICTPOLICECHIEF(RURAL),KOLLAM
CIVILSTATION,KOTARAKARAP.O.,
KOLLAMDISTRICT.

BYADV.

SR.PP.C.N.PRABHAKARAN

THISBAILAPPLICATIONHAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSIONON
27.12.2019,THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYPASSEDTHEFOLLOWING:
BailAppl..No.9283OF2019

2

ORDER

Datedthisthe27thdayofDecember2019

ThisisanapplicationforanticipatorybailfiledunderSection

438ofCr.P.C.

2.ThepetitioneristheaccusedinCrimeNo.2227of2019

oftheSasthamkottaPoliceStationinKollamDistrictforthe

offencespunishableunderSecton498ASectionofIndianPenalCode.

3.Theprosecutioncaseinbriefisashereunder:

Thedefactocomplainantisthewifeoftheaccused.

Theaccusedmarriedthedefactocomplainanton05.11.2018in

accordancewiththecustomprevailingamongthecommunity.

Thereafter,thedefactocomplainantlivedatthematrimonialhome

oftheaccusedforaperiodofthreemonths.Thedefacto

complainantfiledapetitionbeforetheDistrictPoliceCheif,(Rural)

Kollamallegingthattheaccusedill-treatedthedefacto

complainantandtreatedherwithcruelty.

4.Heardthelearnedcounselforthepetitionerand

Sri.C.N.Prabhakaran,thelearnedPublicProsecutor.Perusedthe

casediary.

5.ThepetitioneraccusedfieldO.P.No.982of2019before
BailAppl..No.9283OF2019

3

theFamilyCourt,Chavaraagainstthedefactocomplainant

seekingrecoveryofgoldornamentsallegedtohavebeen

entrustedtoherasperAnnexure-Bcomplaint.Goingbythecase

diary,itappearsthatthepartiesareatloggerheadsinconnection

withamatrimonialdispute.Annexure-BOriginalPetitionis

pendingbeforetheFamilyCourt,Chavarabetweenthesame

parties.Consideringthefactthatthedisputeinvolvedispurelya

matrimonial,itisjustandpropertograntanticipatorybailtothe

petitioneronthefollowingconditions:-

1)Thepetitionershallbereleasedonbailintheevent
ofhisarrestbythepoliceinCrimeNo.2227of
2019oftheSasthamkottaPoliceStation,Kollam
DistrictonhisexecutingabondforRs.50,000/-
(RupeesFiftythousandonly)withtwosolvent
suretieseachforthelikeamounttothe
satisfactionofthearrestingofficer.

2)Thepetitionershallappearbeforethe
InvestigatingOfficerasandwhendirectedbyhim
inwritingtodoso.

3)Thepetitionershallnotinanymannerintimidate
orinfluencetheprosecutionwitnesses.

4)Ifthepetitionerviolatesanyoftheabove
conditionsofbail,itisopentotheCourthaving
BailAppl..No.9283OF2019

4

jurisdictionoverthecasetocancelhisbailwithout
anyfurtherordersfromthisCourtbutin
accordancewithlaw.

Sd/-

N.ANILKUMAR
JUDGE
SCS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation