SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sunil vs State Of Punjab on 24 March, 2017

CRM No.M-5354 of 2016                                                       [1]


                                    Criminal Misc. No.M- 5354 of 2016(OM)
                                              Date of Decision: March 24 , 2017.

Sunil               ...... PETITIONER (s)


State of Punjab            ...... RESPONDENT (s)


Present:    Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Advocate
            for the petitioner.

            Ms. Shivali, AAG, Punjab.

            Mr. Vikrant Rana, Advocate
            for the complainant.
            1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
               the judgment?
            2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
            3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.06 dated 08.01.2016 under Sections 406/498A IPC

registered at Police Station Phase 11, District Mohali.

During the pendency of this petition, the matter has been amicably

resolved between the parties. A compromise dated 24.03.2017 has been

produced in Court today alongwith the affidavits of the petitioner as well as

the complainant. The same are taken on record subject to just exceptions. The

terms and conditions of the settlement are mentioned in this compromise deed.

                                     1 of 2
                  ::: Downloaded on - 26-03-2017 16:48:50 :::
 CRM No.M-5354 of 2016                                                      [2]

The parties have decided to part ways.

Learned counsel for the complainant submits that in view of

settlement arrived at between the parties, the complainant has no objection to

the grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC Parvinder

Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined investigation and he is not

required for custodial interrogation. No recovery is to be effected from him.

In view of the above but without commenting upon or expressing

any opinion on the merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Consequently,

order dated 04.04.2017 is made absolute.

                                                        ( LISA GILL )
March 24 , 2017.                                            JUDGE

                   Whether speaking/reasoned:        Yes/No
                   Whether reportable:               Yes/No

                                    2 of 2
                 ::: Downloaded on - 26-03-2017 16:48:51 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation