1

18.02.2019

.

205.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 2008 of 2019

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 14.02.2019 in connection
with Dubrajpura P. S. Case No.79 of 2018 dated 15.06.2018 under
Sections 498A/323/325/427/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal
Code and Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of : Suraj Badyakar.

… Petitioner.

Mr. Kunal Ganguly.

…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Debabrata Das Gupta.

…..for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been

falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials in the Case Diary and

bearing in mind the general and omnibus nature of allegations and

the fact that the allegation of attempt to murder the victim is not

supported by medical evidence, we are inclined to grant

anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioner viz., Suraj Badyakar shall be released on bail upon
2

furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount

each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further conditon that the

petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until

further order.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)