HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1579 / 2014
1.Suresh Kumar S/o Lt. Shri Shankar Lal
2. Vijay Laxmi W/o Lt. Shri Shanker Lal
Both by caste Chhangani, residents of Surdasani ki Gali, barah
1. The State of Rajasthan.
2. Meena Devi W/o Shri Suresh Kumar, by caste Chhangani,
resident of opposite Bheru Bhawan, Kanasari, Barah guwar,
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H.S.Shrimali
For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S.Rajpurohit, PP and Mr. M.S.Purohit
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment / Order
The respondent Meena Devi is present in the Court. She
categorically stated that no offer whatsoever has been received
from the petitioners for settling dispute amicably and on the
contrary she is being threatened.
Learned counsel Mr. Shrimali vehemently urged that ex-facie
the contents of the impugned F.I.R. No. 67/2014 do not disclose
the necessary ingredients of the offences alleged and thus the
same deserves to be quashed.
Per contra learned P.P. and learned counsel for the
respondent submit that the petitioners misbehaved with the
(2 of 2)
complainant. She was harassed and humiliated on numerous
occasions in relation demand of dowry. Learned P.P. has submitted
the factual report on record, as per which, the I.O. has found the
offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 323 IPC proved against
the petitioners after thorough investigation.
Having given my thoughtful consideration to the arguments
advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and after perusing
the material on record and considering the nature and gravity of
allegations set out in the F.I.R. and the factual report, , I am of
the firm opinion that the necessary ingredients of cognizable
offences are made out against the petitioners and hence it is not a
fit case wherein this Court can be persuaded to exercise its
inherent powers so as to to quash the F.I.R. at the inception.
Hence, the misc. petition is rejected as being devoid of
merit. The I.O. shall forthwith submit the result of investigation in
the Court concerned.
(SANDEEP MEHTA), J.