SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Suresh Naik vs State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2010

Karnataka High Court Suresh Naik vs State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2010Author: N.Ananda

/1 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 97″ DAY OF DECEMBER 20 10 BEFORE

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE N.ANANDA’*».E CRIMINAL PETITION No.5368/2Q–:?§” f _B,,..Em.E__I2n A A

Suresh Naik

S/0. Lachha Naik

Aged about 25 years

R/ o. Marunadu Palya

Huliyur Hobli _

ChikkanayakanahalliTaluk V » .__ ,_ ‘~– . ‘M Tumkur District. ‘ ‘A ” E’ A. ‘ PETITIONER (By Sififl .) A A

Stateof KEai’n_atal&;aA’*. A A Byjijluliyur Police

By–State Public Prloslecutor » i-iigh f)_voi1i*tpVof__Karnataka. …RESPONDENT H Majage, HCGP]

.,Th:s’l Cri.F’ is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C ‘A praying” to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.”N’o.53/2010 of Huliyar Police Station, Tumkur . ‘gD’i–strict, registered for offences punishable under sections 498A 8t 3048 IPC.

This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:

ORDER

The petitioner is the husband of deceased fieetha Bai. Their marriage was performed one and prior to 1.5.2010. Thereafter, deceased 1 house of petitioner. p _ T V

2. On 1.5.2010, deceVa_sedV4Geetha house of petitioner. The the father of deceased,;:4_._”‘:xvhof”‘!6§i_g1?;i4a,.,,,fi;~St vvlinlf0nnat1On_ Therefore, a case was petitioner for offences””punishafb’1–e 498–A & 304-13 & 302 and V.-offences punishable under Sections and Dowry Prohibition Act. After in{resti,.gativon, eidarge sheet was filed for the aforestated ”

3.’ ‘Theg1’llcontents of Post Mortem Examination Replortlll’-{would reveal that deceased had been strangled A death. The Post Mortem Examination reveals ligature mark encircling the neck of deceased. The dead body was found in hanging posture. As per the statement of witnesses, dead body of deceased was brought down b’?. “….’E/L ». -.

from hanging posture. The immediate post occnrrence witnesses have suspected that deceased strangled to death by petitioner and petitioner had made efforts to m’ak–e’ it appeartas ajcase ‘ of suicide. The investigatiorigre-cords'”rereVa1s” facie case for an offence punishabh1eV.ni1–der 302’ IPC. Therefore, peti’t.i_0ne17″can,_not”<he release’d on bail. Accordingly, petition

I188.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation