Karnataka High Court Suresh Naik vs State Of Karnataka on 9 December, 2010Author: N.Ananda
/1 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 97″ DAY OF DECEMBER 20 10 BEFORE
THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE N.ANANDA’*».E CRIMINAL PETITION No.5368/2Q–:?§” f _B,,..Em.E__I2n A A
Suresh Naik
S/0. Lachha Naik
Aged about 25 years
R/ o. Marunadu Palya
Huliyur Hobli _
ChikkanayakanahalliTaluk V » .__ ,_ ‘~– . ‘M Tumkur District. ‘ ‘A ” E’ A. ‘ PETITIONER (By Sififl .) A A
Stateof KEai’n_atal&;aA’*. A A Byjijluliyur Police
By–State Public Prloslecutor » i-iigh f)_voi1i*tpVof__Karnataka. …RESPONDENT H Majage, HCGP]
.,Th:s’l Cri.F’ is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C ‘A praying” to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.”N’o.53/2010 of Huliyar Police Station, Tumkur . ‘gD’i–strict, registered for offences punishable under sections 498A 8t 3048 IPC.
This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
The petitioner is the husband of deceased fieetha Bai. Their marriage was performed one and prior to 1.5.2010. Thereafter, deceased 1 house of petitioner. p _ T V
2. On 1.5.2010, deceVa_sedV4Geetha house of petitioner. The the father of deceased,;:4_._”‘:xvhof”‘!6§i_g1?;i4a,.,,,fi;~St vvlinlf0nnat1On_ Therefore, a case was petitioner for offences””punishafb’1–e 498–A & 304-13 & 302 and V.-offences punishable under Sections and Dowry Prohibition Act. After in{resti,.gativon, eidarge sheet was filed for the aforestated ”
3.’ ‘Theg1’llcontents of Post Mortem Examination Replortlll’-{would reveal that deceased had been strangled A death. The Post Mortem Examination reveals ligature mark encircling the neck of deceased. The dead body was found in hanging posture. As per the statement of witnesses, dead body of deceased was brought down b’?. “….’E/L ». -.
from hanging posture. The immediate post occnrrence witnesses have suspected that deceased strangled to death by petitioner and petitioner had made efforts to m’ak–e’ it appeartas ajcase ‘ of suicide. The investigatiorigre-cords'”rereVa1s” facie case for an offence punishabh1eV.ni1–der 302’ IPC. Therefore, peti’t.i_0ne17″can,_not”<he release’d on bail. Accordingly, petition
I188.