IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-27101-2018
Date of decision: 18.08.2018
Surjit Ram
….. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
….. Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
PRESENT: Mr. JS Banwait, Advocate for
Mr. Sarju Puri, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. AS Gill, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. MS Batth, Advocate for respondent No. 4.
RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No. 4 is taken on
record.
Learned State counsel while filing reply, submits that the
instant petition has rendered infructuous, in view of the fact that an FIR has
been registered against petitioner-Surjit Ram, under Section 406 IPC. Reply
filed by learned State counsel is also taken on record.
Office to tag both the Vakalatnama as well as reply at the
appropriate place.
In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as having
rendered infructuous.
August 18, 2018 ( RAMENDRA JAIN )
rishu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
1 of 1
21-08-2018 23:00:13 :::
