SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

T Murthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 March, 2014

Karnataka High Court T Murthy vs The State Of Karnataka on 25 March, 2014Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA

WRIT PETITION NO.51587/2013 (S-RES) & WRIT PETITION NOS.14165-14176/2014 (S-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. T MURTHY

S/O THYAGARAJA

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO 123, ASHRAYA YOJANA BADAVANE NARASIMHA NAYAKA NAGAR HOLENARASIPURA 573 211 HASSAN DISTRICT.

2. DAYANANDA P.S. S/O SIDDALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/AT PILLENAHALLI VILLAGE HALEKOTE HOBLI

HOLENARASIPUR TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573 211.

3. MUTHURAJ

S/O MUNIRAJU B S

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT TONDE BHAVI (RAILWAY STATION) GOWRIBIDANUR TALUK – 561 208 CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT

4. B N KUMARA S/O NINGEGOWDA

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT BYALADAKERE VILLAGE 2

G NAGATIHALLI POST BELLUR HOBLI – 571 432 NAGAMANGALA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT

5. SUDHARSHAN RAO S/O NAGESH RAO

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT NO E 7, KEB COLONY RAJAJINAGARA

3RD BLOCK NEAR ESI HOSPITAL BANGALORE 560 010

6. RAGHAVENDRA T H S/O M HANUMANTHA

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT SRI RAMA NILAYA SIT 6TH CROSS, 2ND LINK TUMKUR TOWN

TUMKUR – 572 101.

7. BHASKAR H H

S/O HARI

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS AMBEDKAR NAGAR

KERALAPUR ROAD

NARASIPURA – 573 211 HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT

8. B C SHIVALINGAIAH S/O CHIKKALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT BHUVALLI VILLAGE KADAHALLI POST – 562 117 SATHANURU HOBLI, KANAKPUR TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT

9. SRINIVAS R

S/O RANGAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT C.S.G. PALYA TAVINAKERE POST

3

C N DURGA HOBLI

KORATAGERE TALUK

TUMKUR DISTRICT – 572 129.

10. NAGESH H J S/O JAYARAME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT OLD ATTIGUPPE VILLAGE DODDASOMANAHALLI POST SANTHEBACHAHALLI HOBLI K R PET TALUK

MANDYA DISTRICT 571 426

11. ASHOK KUMAR B M S/O MALLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT BETTADA SATENAHALLI VILLAGE BHAGEVALU POST – 573 211 HOLENARASIPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT

12. M S SHIVARAMU S/O SHIVANNA

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS R/AT H.L.B.C. NO 10 KIKKERI VILLAGE,

K R PET TALUK

MANDYA DISTRICT 571 426.

13. S NAGENDRA S/O SIDDIAH

AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS NO 576, 8TH CROSS RAJAGOPALA NAGARA BANGALORE 560058

… PETITIONERS

(BY SRI D.K.KIRAN KUMAR, ADV.)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO ELECTRICITY DEPARTMENT 4

VIKASA SOUDHA

BANGALORE 560 001

R-1 STRUCK OFF VIDE COURT ORDER DTD: 21.3.2014

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY TRANSPORT LIMITED SESCOM, EXECUTIVE DIVISION HOLENARASIPURA – 573 211. HASSAN DISTRICT

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY TRANSPORT LIMITED SESCOM, EXECUTIVE DIVISION MANDYA DIVISION

MANDYA 571 401

4. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTANT OFFICER THE CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY TRANSPORT LIMITED MANDYA DIVIISON

MANDYA – 571 401

MANDYA DISTRICT.

5. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTANT OFFICER THE CHAMUNDESHWARI ELECTRICITY TRANSPORT LIMITED MADDUR DIVISION

MADDUR – 571 428

MANDYA DISTRICT

… RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI HARIKRISHNA S HOLLA, ADV. FOR R2-5)

THESE PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 4 TO GIVE THE SERVICE BENEFITS FROM DATED 3.12.2007 TO 31.12.2010 BENEFITS OF THE PETITIONERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 TO 4 TO PAY ALL SERVICE BENEIFITS. 5

THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Memo filed by the learned advocate for the

petitioners to dismiss the petitions as not pressed is placed

on record and the writ petitions stand disposed of, in terms

of the memo for withdrawal filed today, with no order as to

costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE

ca

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation