SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Taranjeet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 28 February, 2018


Criminal Misc. No. M- 20852 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : February 28, 2018

Taranjeet Singh …..Petitioner

State of Punjab and another ….Respondents


Present: Mr. Yashpal Thakur , Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Monika Jalota, DAG, Punjab.

Mr. Manjit Singh, Advocate
for respondent No. 2.

Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 12 dated 19.04.2017 under Section 406/498A IPC

registered at Police Station Women, District SAS Nagar, Mohali.

During the pendency of this petition, the matter has been

amicably settled between the parties before the Mediation and

Conciliation Centre of this Court on 22.01.2018. Settlement/agreement

dated 22.01.2018 is attached with the file of this case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No. 2

submit that due to the petitioner being indisposed, they could not take

steps for withdrawl of the respective litigation initiated by them against

each other. Necessary action shall be taken by them within next two

weeks. It is informed that the petitioner and respondent No. 2 are now

living together in the matrimonial home in peace and harmony

alongwith the minor child.

1 of 2
04-03-2018 11:53:46 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 20852 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 submits that

respondent No. 2 has no objection, in case, this petition is allowed

subject to the petitioner adhering to the terms and conditions of the

settlement. Respondent No. 2 also agrees to adhere to the said terms

and conditions.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI

Jarnail Singh, verifies that the petitioner is not involved in any other

criminal case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above

but without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is

considered just and expedient to allow this petition. In the event of his

arrest, petitioner shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of

Investigating Officer/Arresting officer. He shall appear before the

Investigating agency as and when required. Petitioner shall comply

with the conditions stipulated in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Lisa Gill)
February 28, 2018 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
04-03-2018 11:53:49 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation