SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Tejinderpal Singh @ Vicky vs State Of Punjab on 14 February, 2020

CRM-M No.53669 of 2019 (OM) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.53669 of 2019 (OM)
Date of Decision.14.02.2020

Tejinderpal Singh @ Vicky …Petitioner

Vs

State of Punjab …Respondent

CORAM:HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present: Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Davinder Bir Singh, DAG, Punjab.

-.-

JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)

CRM No.3887 of 2020

Application is allowed as prayed for.

Annexures P-3 to P-5 are taken on record.

CRM-M No.53669 of 2019

1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.95 dated

28.09.2019 under Sections 354 IPC and Section 7 of POCSO Act, 2012

registered at Police Station Cantonment, Jalandhar.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present FIR and is in custody

since 28.09.2019. The challan has already been presented and statement of

the prosecutrix has been recorded.

3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondent-State opposes the bail application, while contending that the

offences alleged against the petitioner are serious in nature and therefore, he

1 of 2
15-02-2020 20:39:13 :::
CRM-M No.53669 of 2019 (OM) -2-

is not entitled to concession of regular bail.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. Since the challan has already been presented and statement of

prosecutrix has been record and the trial is likely to take some time to

conclude, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the petitioner

behind the bars. The instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is

directed to be released on regular bail on execution of adequate personal

bond and surety bond to the satisfaction of concerned trial Court/Duty

Magistrate. However, any observation made herein shall not be construed

to be an expression on merits of the case.

(JAISHREE THAKUR)
JUDGE
February 14, 2020
Pankaj*

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No

Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
15-02-2020 20:39:14 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation