SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

The Dowry Prohibition Act. (G.R. … vs In Re: Juyel Sk. @ Solet Sk. @ Md. … on 5 September, 2019

1

05.09.19

Sl. No.193
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 7877 of 2019

In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on
27.08.2019 in connection with Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 09 of 2019 dated
04.01.2019 under Sections 498A/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/Section4 of
the Dowry Prohibition Act. (G.R. Case No.89 of 2019)

And

In Re: Juyel Sk. @ Solet Sk. @ Md. Juyel Sk.

… … Petitioner
Mr. Debapriya Samanta .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy .. Advocate
Ms. Rita Datta .. Advocate
… … for the State

The petitioner is seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences

punishable under Sections 498A/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/Section4 of

the Dowry Prohibition Act.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is considerable delay in

lodging FIR. It is further submitted that co-accused persons have been granted pre-arrest

bail.

Learned Counsel for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer

for bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of

allegations in the light of the submission relating to delay in lodging FIR and as there is no

progress in the matter since the last rejection of pre-arrest bail by this court, we are of the

opinion that further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary.
2

Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Juyel Sk. @ Solet Sk. @ Md. Juyel

Sk., be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only),

with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of

the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh, Murshidabad subject to

condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of

hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in

any manner whatsoever.

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the

trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.

The application for bail, thus, stands allowed.

(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation