1 apeal388-97-jud.doc
sas
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELL ATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.388 OF 1997
Ankush Bhiku Pandhare,
Age: 34 years, Occu: Service,
R/o. Bhavaninagar, Taluka
Indapur, District Pune. ..Appellant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Mr.Rupesh Atul Zade for the Appellant.
Mr.Deepak Thakre, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : P.N.DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 9 MAY 2017
ORAL JUDGMENT
This is an appeal filed by the Appellant-original accused
against the judgment and order dated 30 June, 1997 passed by the
Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati in Sessions Case No.62/1995
whereby the accused came to be convicted for the offences punishable
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
2 apeal388-97-jud.doc
under section 498A and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to
suffer R.I. for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- i/d. to suffer R.I.
for three months for offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian
Penal Code and for offence punishable under section 306 of Indian Penal
Code to suffer R.I. for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- i/d to
suffer R.I. for nine months. Both the sentences are directed to run
concurrently. The original accused Nos.2 and 3, the parents of the
Appellant are acquitted of the above charges.
2. In brief, it is the case of the prosecution that deceased Rani
@ Mangala was married to Appellant on 31 December, 1987 and
thereafter she was co-habiting with the Appellant at his native place
Bhavani Nagar, while the Appellant used to visit Pune as he used to work
there. It is the case of the prosecution that from the date of the marriage
till 31 January, 1995, deceased was treated good. However, thereafter was
harassed and subjected to beating on the ground that deceased has
brought less articles from her parents’ house in marriage and for this
reason, they were demanding money for purchasing plot, gold ring, etc.
However, the parents of the deceased since could not satisfy the unlawful
demand, deceased committed suicide on 31 January, 1995 by consuming
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
3 apeal388-97-jud.doc
poison and died while under medical treatment at Sassoon Hospital, Pune
on 1 February, 1995.
3. The information about the death of Mangala was given by
the Hospital authorities to the Bund Garden police station, who informed
about the same to Walchandnagar police station where Accidental Death
No.5/1995 was registered and was investigated by PW13 Lalit Pandule,
PSI. Post mortem was performed by PW15 Dr.Rajendra Zope and he
certified that the death of the deceased was caused due to poisonous
substance. PW13 Lalit Pandule during the course of inquiry recorded
statements of PW1 Shantabai and on the basis of her report Exhibit-26,
registered offence vide Crime No.6/ 1995 and further investigated the
case. He prepared the spot panchanama Exhibit-33 and recorded
statements of witnesses and after completion of investigation, filed
charge-sheet in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Indapur. In the course of time, the case came to be committed for trial to
the Sessions Court. Charge came to be framed against the accused who
pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The defence of the accused is
total denial and false implication in the case.
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
4 apeal388-97-jud.doc
4. To establish the charge against the accused, prosecution has
examined as many as 15 witnesses. PW1 Shantabai is the mother of the
deceased who has lodged report Exhibit-26. PW3 Dr.Mahadeo, PW6
Dr.Ransingh Wable and PW7 Dr.Harischandra to whom Mangala was
referred after she had consumed poison. PW2 Rajendra is the brother of
the deceased. PW4 Laxman is the grand father of the deceased. PW5
Suryaban Dhakane who has proved spot panchanama Exhibit-33. PW8
Vijaya, the complainant’s sister, PW9 Tukaram, the father of the
deceased, PW10 Saraswati is the neighbourer of the Appellant and the
deceased. PW11 Hanumant Waghmode is the cousin brother of the
deceased. PW12 Naryan Pethe, the Police Head Constable attached to
Walchandnagar Police Station, who carried the viscera to the Chemical
Analyser’s office. PW13 P.S.I. Lalit Pandule is the investigation officer.
PW14 Laxman Bhosale is the police officer who recorded the report
Exhibit-26 and registered the offence vide Crime No.6/1995. The
learned trial Judge considering the evidence of various witnesses and
documents proved on record, convicted the Appellant as aforesaid.
Hence this appeal.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and learned
APP. He submitted that from the evidence of the witnesses namely,
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
5 apeal388-97-jud.doc
complainant, the mother, brother and other relatives of the deceased, no
case is made out by the prosecution establishing ingredients required for
the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. It is also
contended that the learned trial Judge has erroneously relied upon the
letters alleged to be written by the deceased during her lifetime to her
family members, alleging ill-treatment provided out to her by the
Appellant and his parents contending that no investigation is carried out
to establish that the letters on record at Exhibits 21 to 25 are in the
handwriting of the deceased and thus contended that the evidence in the
form of letters as aforesaid requires to be discarded on this ground itself. It
is, therefore, submitted that in the absence of sufficient evidence no case
is made out against the Appellant to establishing his involvement for an
offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
6. With regard to the case of the prosecution for the offence
punishable under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, it is submitted
that there is absolutely no evidence establishing that immediately prior to
deceased committing suicide, the Appellant has in any manner abetted
the commission of the same as it was contended that, according to the
prosecution case, the alleged quarrel between the deceased and accused
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
6 apeal388-97-jud.doc
took place at the time of marriage of Bharat, brother of the accused, on 27
December, 1994 and since the deceased, as per the case of the
prosecution, has consumed poison on 31 January, 1995, it cannot be said
that there was any kind of abetment by Appellant to deceased to commit
suicide and, therefore, learned counsel for Appellant prays that the appeal
be allowed.
7. The learned APP has contended that from the evidence on
record Appellant’s involvement in the present crime is clearly established
and has thus submitted that the appeal be dismissed. The learned APP has
supported the impugned judgment and order.
8. In the background of submissions as aforesaid, on
considering evidence of PW1 Shantbai, it reveals that the deceased was
married to the Appellant on 31 December, 1987 and since marriage, the
Appellant was working at Pune while the deceased was residing with her
in-laws at Bhavani Nagar in Indapur Taluka, District Pune situated at a
distance of 100 Kms from Pune. With regard to the alleged harassment
provided by Appellant to deceased, evidence of PW1 Shantabai appears
to be too vague as according to her, after marriage, deceased was treated
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
7 apeal388-97-jud.doc
well for about one year and was thereafter subjected to ill-treatment. In
fact, it is found from the evidence of Shantabai that the ill-treatment was
in fact alleged to have been provided to her by Indubai, mother of the
Appellant, who is already acquitted.
9. From the evidence of the complainant PW1 Shantabai, it has
further come on record that during her lifetime, deceased had sent letters
on record marked as Exhibits 21 to 25 and by all these letters, she had
communicated that she was subjected to ill-treatment at the hands of the
Appellant-accused and his parents. On perusal of the impugned
judgment, the learned trial Court in paragraphs 27 and 29 relied upon the
said letters and on reading the contents thereof, has held that from the
letters it is established that the deceased was subjected to ill-treatment
during her lifetime. The approach of the learned trial Judge in relying
upon these letters, is not at all acceptable having considering the fact that
there is no investigation on record as to whether the letters Exhibits-21 to
25 are in the handwriting of the deceased. Admittedly, no specimen
handwriting of the deceased was obtained during investigation nor it is
the case of the prosecution that any notebook or any other note in the
handwriting of deceased was seized and the same was sent along with the
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
8 apeal388-97-jud.doc
alleged letters to the Handwriting Expert to obtain opinion if the letters
are in fact in the handwriting of the deceased or otherwise. In absence of
any such evidence on record, the learned trial Judge has come to the
conclusion from these letters that deceased Mangala had informed about
her ill-treatment to her parents. It is material to note that the learned trial
Judge on considering contents of the letters Exhibits 21 to 25 had in fact
observed that these letters does not establish that there was any
harassment to the deceased on account of demand of plot, gold ring or
utensils. From the evidence of PW1 Shantabai, PW2 Rajendra, PW8
Vijaya and PW10 Saraswati, it is stated that they heard about having
harassment to Mangala only from the letters sent by her, however, in view
of admitted fact of having no investigation carried out on this aspect,
evidence of PW1 Shantabai, PW2 Rajendra, PW8 Vijaya and PW 10
Saraswati is not at all credible. In that view of the matter, there is
absolutely no evidence to establish that deceased was in any manner
subjected to ill-treatment within the meaning of section 498A of the
Indian Penal Code.
10. With regard to the charge for the offence punishable under
section 306 of the Indian Penal Code is concerned, on considering further
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
9 apeal388-97-jud.doc
evidence of PW1 Shantabai, it has come on record that on 28 December,
1994 the Appellant visited their house and had invited for marriage of his
brother Bharat which was to be performed on 27 December, 1994 at
Village Nirgude. Accordingly, Shantabai, PW2 Rajendra and PW8 Vijaya
and other relatives attended the said marriage. Shantabai’s evidence
further reveals that on that day quarrel took place between the deceased
and her mother-in-law Indubai when Appellant beat the deceased. Similar
is the evidence of PW8 Vijaya. However, it is material to note that
besides the evidence of alleged beating on 27 December, 1994, there is
absolutely no evidence that after this incident any incident took place
establishing mental or physical ill-treatment or torture or beating
provided to deceased by the Appellant due to which she consumed poison
on 31 January, 1995 and died of the same on 1 February, 1995. In that
view of the matter and considering the long time gap, by no stretch of
imagination it can be said that the act of suicide by deceased Mangala on
31 January, 1995 is on account of harassment of beating by the Appellant
on 27 December, 1994.
11. The case of prosecution is even otherwise doubtful, from its
inception as from the evidence of Shantabai, it has come on record that
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
10 apeal388-97-jud.doc
after deceased had consumed poison on 31 December, 1995, she died
while under medical treatment at the Sassoon Hospital, Pune on 1
February, 1995 and that after her death, the hospital authorities had
informed Bund Garden police station about the death of Mangala who in
turn informed Walchandnagar police station as said incident took place
within its jurisdiction when A.D. was registered. It is, therefore, found
that while investigating the crime, police arrived at the house of the
complainant at Kasarwadi on 6 February, 1995. Spot panchanama was
drawn on 5 February, 1995. It is the not case of the complainant that she
has lodged her complaint with the police on her own. In fact, Shantabai
has admitted that in her presence, inquest panchanama was carried out by
the police in Sassoon Hospital and even at the time of performing post
mortem, other relatives were present. In spite of that, it is noted that
there was no complaint lodged with the police.
12. From the evidence of PW1 Shantabai it is further come on
record that 5 to 6 days thereafter, on 5 February, 1995 Police Officer of
Walchandnagar police station came to her house at Pune and had
specifically called her to police station on 7 February, 1995 where she
lodged the report Exhibit-26. As per her evidence, she has lodged the
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
11 apeal388-97-jud.doc
report at the instance of police. In view of evidence as evidence as
aforesaid, it cannot be said that PW1 Shantabai wanted to lodge report
after the death of the deceased. It, therefore, goes to establish that
deceased had not committed suicide for reasons as put forth by the
prosecution and, therefore, Shantabai never wanted to lodge her report.
However, it is noted that at the instance of police, seven days after the
death of Mangala, the report came to be lodged by her as insisted by
police.
13. On considering the evidence on record as aforesaid, as
prosecution is found to have failed to establish the charge against the
Appellant, appeal is liable to be allowed by setting aside conviction and
sentence awarded by the trial Court. In the result, appeal is allowed. The
Appellant is on bail. His bail bond stands discharged. Fine amount, if
paid, be refunded back to the Appellant.
(P.N.DESHMUKH, J.)
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::
12 apeal388-97-jud.doc
::: Uploaded on – 15/05/2017 ::: Downloaded on – 17/05/2017 00:28:47 :::