SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

The State Of Maharashtra vs Prashant Sadashiv Chaudhari & Ors on 18 November, 2019

1/2 apeal-384-03(204).doc


The State of Maharashtra ..Appellant
Prashant Sadashiv Chaudhari Ors ..Respondents

Ms Anamika Malhotra, APP for State/Appellant


DATE : 18th NOVEMBER 2019


1 On 24-6-2019, as nobody was present despite the order of 8-5-

2019, this court directed to issue a bailable warrant against respondents to

be executed through Judicial Magtistrate First Class, Nashik within two

weeks. The 9th Joint CJSD and Additional C.J.M., Nashik has submitted a

report dated 9-9-2019 stating that the bailable warrant was issued twice to

accused but the same was received unserved due to insufficient address.

The address has to be provided by appellant. The report says that plot

no.11, which is shown as the address of the accused, is an empty plot. It is

the job of the prosecution to trace the accused and for that, if the

prosecution only takes the trouble of going through the records and

proceedings, they would have come to know that in the complaint (firyad)

dated 5-7-1999, the complainant has given two addresses, one is of Plot

No.11, Kamathwada Road, Opposite Matale Mangal Karyalay, Nashik and

Meera Jadhav

::: Uploaded on – 19/11/2019 19/11/2019 23:34:25 :::
2/2 apeal-384-03(204).doc

the other is at Post Sakharwadi, next to Sheti Mahamandal, Taluka

Kopargaon, Zilla Ahmednagar. In the evidence, the father of the

complainant – Madhukar Samarit, has also given his address as Laxmiwadi,

Taluka Rahata, District Ahemdnagar. The prosecution should take the

trouble of doing a page turn, try to contact each of the witnesses and then

locate the accused. As this is a matter under Section 498A of the Indian

Penal Code, certainly that would help. The police cannot simply return the

papers saying not traceable or address incomplete. I have to take note that

this has become a habit for police officers and they make no efforts, when

the State itself is the appellant.

2 As last chance, stand over to 25-11-2019, by which date, if the

prosecution does not make any progress to track the accused, the court may

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


Meera Jadhav

::: Uploaded on – 19/11/2019 19/11/2019 23:34:25 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation