SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Tinkesh Kumar vs State Of Punjab And Another on 9 May, 2017

CRM No.M-28744 of 2016 [1]


Criminal Misc. No.M- 28744 of 2016(OM)
Date of Decision: May 9 , 2017.

Tinkesh Kumar …… PETITIONER (s)


State of Punjab and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. Shekhar Verma, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl.AG, Punjab.

Mr. R.S.Bajaj, Advocate
for the complainant/respondent No.2.
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see
the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No.34 dated 31.03.2016 under Sections 498A/406 IPC

registered at Police Station Women Cell, Jalandhar.

It is submitted that during the pendency of this petition the matter

has been amicably resolved between the parties. The terms and conditions of

the settlement have been reduced into writing today itself. Affidavits dated

09.05.2017 of the petitioner as well as respondent No.2 alongwith

1 of 2
03-06-2017 14:07:07 :::
CRM No.M-28744 of 2016 [2]

Compromise dated 09.05.2017, filed in Court today, is taken on record subject

to just exceptions. The petitioner and respondent No.2 have decided to part

ways. The parties to the agreement shall abide by the terms and conditions of

this settlement in letter and spirit.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Balbir

Chand, Police Station Women Cell, Jalandhar, submits that the petitioner has

joined investigation.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the petitioner

is likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from deposing

true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances as above but without

commenting upon or expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this

petition is allowed. Consequently, order dated 19.08.2016 is made absolute.

May 9 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

2 of 2
03-06-2017 14:07:09 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation