SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Tinku & Ors. vs State & Anr. on 3 September, 2019

$~39
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 03.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4411/2019 Crl.M.A. 34985/2019
TINKU ORS. ….. Petitioners
Through Adv. (appearance not given)

Versus

STATE ANR. ….. Respondents
Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State.
ASI Sugam Singh PS Mangol Puri.

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

520/2013 dated 28.08.2013 registered at Police Station Mangol Puri

instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the

IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

Notice issued.

Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

CRL.M.C. 4411/2019 Page 1 of 3

The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 28.06.2009 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. On 28.08.2013, respondent no.2 lodged FIR for

the offences mentioned above against the petitioners.

The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled

their disputes and the respondent no.2 submits that she has received the

settlement amount and has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

The complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person and has been

identified by ASI Sugam Singh at Police Station Mangol Puri and she does

not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 520/2013 dated

28.08.2013 registered at Police Station Mangol Puri instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings are quashed.

The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Pending application also stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4411/2019 Page 2 of 3
Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
September 03, 2019
ab

CRL.M.C. 4411/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation