SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Triloki Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. on 11 November, 2019

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

?Court No. – 51

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. – 47999 of 2019

Applicant :- Triloki Singh And 3 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Srivastava,Archana Srivastava

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon’ble Vipin Sinha,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and Sri V.K.Pandey, learned A. G. A. for the State

Applicants has moved the present anticipatory bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No. 289 of 2019, under Section 498A, Section323, Section506 IPC and Section 3/Section4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Firozabad South, District Firozabad.

I have perused the prosecution story as set up in the F.I.R. and also the anticipatory bail rejection order.

Contention as raised at the Bar by learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case; that applicant no. 4 happens to be husband and other applicants are family members; that wife of applicant no. 4 is the first informant and marriage is of 16.04.2019; much reliance has been placed on the averments made in paragraph nos. 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the bail application and the document which is annexed at page 43 of the application contents of which are self explicit; the matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to.

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicants.

It has been consistently held that the plentitude of Section 438 CrPC must be given its full play. There is no requirement that the accused must make out a “special case” for the exercise of the power to grant anticipatory bail as it virtually, reduces the salutary power conferred by Section 438 CrPC to a dead letter.

Keeping in view the reasons as stated above, the facts and circumstances of the case as have been discussed at the Bar of this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

In the event of arrest of the applicants, Triloki Singh, Prem Chandra, Smt. Sarita and Yogesh involved in the aforesaid case, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) the applicants will join and participate in each and every aspect of “Investigation” and will lend full assistance to the Investigating Agency even with regard to “discovery of fact” if and when required so by the Investigating Agency or the concerned court;

(ii) the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

iii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

(iv) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. Concerned.

In default or misuse of any of the conditions, the Public Prosecutor/Investigating Officer/first informant-complainant is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

Order Date :- 11.11.2019

Ujjawal

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation