SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Tuhin Mahanto @ Tuhin Mahanta vs Unknown on 31 July, 2019

1

31.07.2019

.

80.
as
(Allowed).

C.R.M. 6818 of 2019

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 29.07.2019 in connection
with Tamluk P. S. Case No.353 of 2019 dated 04.07.2019 under
Sections 498A/Section406/Section384/Section307/Section506(2)/Section34/Section120B of the Indian Penal
Code and Section 4 of the D. P. Act.

In the matter of : Tuhin Mahanto @ Tuhin Mahanta.

… Petitioner.

Mr. Debasis Kar.

…for the Petitioner.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh,
Mr. Bitasok Banerjee.

…..for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been

falsely implicated in the instant case out of matrimonial dispute.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in

mind general and omnibus nature of allegations and as the

allegation of physical assault is not supported by medical

evidence, we are inclined in granting anticipatory bail to the

petitioner.

2

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the

petitioner viz., Tuhin Mahanto @ Tuhin Mahanta shall be released

on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of

like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the

petitioner shall appear before the trial court and pray for regular

bail within four weeks from date and on further condition that the

petitioner shall meet the investigating officer once in a week until

further orders.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation