SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Tushar Garg And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 20 February, 2020





Tushar Garg Ors. … Applicants
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent


Mr.Kiran Verma i/b. Rajeev Sawnt Associates, Advocate for the

Mr.S.V.Gavand, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Respondent No.2/State.



DATED : 20th FEBRUARY 2020.

P.C. :
1 By this application under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the applicants, who happen to be original

respondents in an application under Section 12 of the Protection

of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred

to as the “D.V.Act” for the sake of brevity) filed by respondent No.2

herein are praying for quashing and setting aside those


Gaikwad RD 1/4

2 Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the

applicants/original respondents in the proceedings under the

D.V.Act. He argued that till filing of the proceedings under the

D.V.Act relationship between the parties was cordial. However,

subsequently, the respondent No.2/an aggrieved person had

lodged report alleging commission of offence under Section 498A

of the Indian Penal Code etc. against the applicant No.1 herein

and his relatives. It is further argued that record filed with the

application would show that the respondent No.2 herein/an

aggrieved person was having adulterous relationship with some

other person. At the instance of the applicant No.1/husband,

report of non-cognizable case was also registered in the matter.

The learned Counsel for the applicants further argued that right

from the year 2007, both daughters of the applicant No.1 and

respondent No.2 are being maintained by the applicant No.1 and

these two daughters are not residing with the respondent No.2

herein/an aggrieved person. Therefore, in submission of the

learned Counsel for the applicants, proceedings under the D.V.Act

needs to be quashed and set aside.

Gaikwad RD 2/4

3 I have considered the submissions so advanced and

also perused the application under Section 12 of the D.V.Act which

is at page 119 onwards in the paper-book. In the said application,

the respondent No.2 herein/an aggrieved person has made

averments regarding commission of domestic violence on her by

respondents therein i.e. present applicants. She has alleged about

the fact that she is in domestic relationship with applicants herein.

The application reflects commission of domestic violence while in

domestic relationship with present applicants and, therefore, other

aspects of the matter pails into insignificance.

4 At this juncture, it cannot be said that so-called

adulterous relationship is a factor which requires quashing of the

proceedings under the D.V.Act. It is a mere allegation which is not

proved before any Court of law and moreover, that cannot be a

ground of quashing the proceedings under the D.V.Act. One of the

cited contention that the relationship were cordial cannot be

accepted in the wake of averments in the proceedings under the


Gaikwad RD                                                          3/4

5 No case for interference at the hands of this Court is

made out. The application is, therefore, rejected.

Raju D.

Digitally signed
by Raju D.

Date: 2020.02.21
11:56:30 +0530

Gaikwad RD 4/4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation