SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Tutoo Singh @ Abhiram Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 2 May, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20670 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2012 Thana- MUSAHARI District- Muzaffarpur

TUTOO SINGH @ ABHIRAM SINGH Son of Late Anil Singh Resident of
Village – Rohua apuchh, P.S.- Mushahari, Distt – Muzaffapur.

… … Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar

… … Opposite Party/s

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nachiketa Jha
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Matloob Rab

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
ORAL ORDER

3 02-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make

necessary correction in paragraph 1 of the main application in

course of the day.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offences under Section 376/Section511 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in short is that while the

informant was on the way, the accused person caught her with

bad intention but, on hulla, the accused person fled away.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

the petitioner is in custody since 16.2.2019 and has got no

criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of

witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20670 of 2019(3) dt.02-05-2019
2/2

submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been

implicated in the present case. Due to previous enmity, the

present case has been instituted. No rape has been committed

upon the victim. At best, it is a case for offence under Section

354 IPC.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the

petitioner is named in the F.I.R..

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on

bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

learned 13th A.D.J., Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions

Trial No. 792/2016 arising out of Mushahari P.S. Case No.

139/2012

(Sudhir Singh, J)
Pankaj/-

U T

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation