SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Uma Sharma vs State Of Haryana And Another on 24 February, 2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Criminal Misc. No.M-39327 of 2019 (OM)
Date of Decision: 24.02.2020

Uma Sharma
…Petitioner (s)
Versus
State of Haryana another
…Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA

Present:- Mr. Aditya Jain, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Ms. Priyanka Sadar, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Vijender Dhankhar, Advocate
for respondent no.2.
*****

HARI PAL VERMA, J. (Oral)

CRM-4765-2020:

The application is allowed, as prayed. Annexure P-3 is taken

on record subject to all just exceptions.

Criminal Misc. No.M-39327 of 2019:

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 439(2) of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is for cancellation of regular bail

granted to respondent no.2 by Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad vide

order dated 17.07.2019 in case FIR No.0074 dated 28.05.2019 under

1 of 2
26-02-2020 00:36:01 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M-39327 of 2019 -2-

Sections 34, 406, 498A registered at Women Police Station Faridabad,

District Faridabad.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no.2 after

getting bail from the trial Court, has harassed the petitioner many times.

He chased her through different vehicles and even quarreled with her after

stopping her on the way, due to which, the petitioner has submitted

representations to Superintendent of Police, Faridabad.

State counsel, on instructions from the Investigating Officer

submits that in the aforesaid FIR, the police has already conducted

investigation and submitted challan on 04.10.2019.

In view of the aforesaid, the present petition has been rendered

infructuous.

Dismissed as infructuous.

However, as regards the argument on behalf of the petitioner

that she has been harassed by respondent no.2, regarding which, she has

already submitted representations to Superintendent of Police, Faridbad, a

direction is issued to Commissioner of Police/Superintendent of Police,

Faridbad to look into the representations so submitted by the petitioner and

take appropriate steps to protect the life liberty of the petitioner in

accordance with law.

February 24, 2020 ( HARI PAL VERMA )
AK JUDGE

Whether speaking / reasoned? Yes / No
Whether reportable? Yes / No

2 of 2
26-02-2020 00:36:01 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation