SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Utpal Das & Ors vs The State & Anr on 18 September, 2019

$~48
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 18.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4701/2019
UTPAL DAS ORS ….. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Salim Alvi, Adv. with Petitioners
in person
versus

THE STATE ANR ….. Respondents
Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State.
Mr. Aditya Swarup Agarwal, Adv. for
R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A.36069/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4701/2019

2. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

541/2017 dated 13.09.2017, registered at Police Station – Ashok Nagar,

instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the

IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

3. Notice issued.

CRL.M.C.4701/2019 Page 1 of 3

4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2. Subsequently, with the consent of the counsel for the

parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.09.2014 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. One male child was born out of the wedlock

namely, Neelanjan Das. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the

petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately since

20.12.2015.

6. The petitioner no. 1 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable

settlement vide memorandum of understanding dated 11.04.2019 and settled

all their disputes amicably. The total settlement amount is ₹5,00,000/-

(Rupees Five Lakhs only). It is submitted that the respondent No. 2 has

already received an amount of ₹3,00,000 (Rupees three lakhs only). A

demand draft bearing No.500469 dated 21.08.2019 for the balance amount

of ₹2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) is handed over to the respondent No.

2 today in the Court i.e. on 18.09.2019.

7. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Chandan and submits that matter has been settled and she

does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

CRL.M.C.4701/2019 Page 2 of 3

8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 541/2017 dated

13.09.2017, registered at Police Station – Ashok Nagar, instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed accordingly.

11. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE

SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PB

CRL.M.C.4701/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation