SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vahid vs State Of Haryana on 10 July, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRL. MISC. No.M-11668 OF 2017
DATE OF DECISION : 10th JULY, 2017

Vahid
…. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
…. Respondent

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. B. CHAUDHARI
****
Present : Mr. M. D. Khan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana.
****
A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.225 dated 25.06.2016 registered under

Sections 148, 149, 323, 354 and 506 IPC (Section 354 IPC deleted later on)

at Police Station Hathin, District Palwal.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.

The petitioner was granted interim bail by this court vide order

dated 06.04.2017.

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Mahender

Singh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his

custody is not required.

In that view of the matter interim order dated 06.04.2017 is

made absolute.

Disposed of accordingly.

10TH JULY, 2017 (A. B. CHAUDHARI)
‘raj’ JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No
Whether Reportable : Yes No

1 of 1
15-07-2017 21:54:40 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh