SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Veena Devi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 6 December, 2019



Cr.MP(M) No. 2083 of 2019

Reserved on : November 29 , 2019
Date of Decision: December 6 , 2019

Veena Devi …Petitioner.
State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent.


The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Jiwan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit
Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

For the respondent : M/s. Anil Jaswal, Ashwani K. Sharma and Nand
Lal Thakur, Additional Advocates General for

the respondent/State.

Anoop Chitkara, Judge.

Upon arrest as a member of an unlawful cohort of orthodox

villagers, who in furtherance of common object, smeared soot on

the face of an old lady, garlanded her with shoes, broke her house-

hold articles along with idols of worship, on the superstition that she

indulged in witchcraft, and also smeared soot on her middle-aged

daughter, who came to her rescue, the accused has come up before

this Court, seeking regular bail.


Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP

2. The gist of the facts, apposite to adjudicate the present bail

petition, traces its origin to the complaint dated Nov 9, 2019, scribed


by Shri Ajay Kumar, a practicing Advocate. He informed the SHO of

Police Station Sarkaghat, Distt. Mandi, H.P., that his mother-in-law is

an old lady, and has two daughters. On Oct 17, 2019, the villagers

misbehaved with her. Again, on Oct 29, 2019, villagers gathered and

arrived at her house, broke open the doors, and threw away all the

articles, including idols of worship. He stated that even on that date,

he had made a complaint. He further mentioned that on Nov 6,

2019, the ladies and boys of the village administered beatings to his

mother-in-law and sister-in-law. They also smeared their faces with

soot and garlanded his mother-in-law with a string of shoes. They

also made videography of all these acts and posted it on social

media. After that, he named the accused persons and sought their


3. Based on this information, Police Station Sarkaghat, Distt.

Mandi, registered in its file, FIR No. 184 of 2019, dated 9.11.2019,

for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, Section149,

Section454, Section455, Section435, Section354, Section355, Section427, Section504, Section506, Section508, Section323, Section500, Section380,

Section201,Section120B of IPC. The Police swiftly arrested the accused. As per the

statement of Shri Nand Lal Thakur, Additional Advocate General for

06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP

the State of Himachal Pradesh, the investigation is going on under

the active supervision of the police officials of the highest ranks.


4. This Court has granted bail to one of the accused namely

Bimla Devi in Cr.MP(M) No. 2070 of 2019, vide a detailed and

reasoned order. Applying the same reasoning, in my considered

opinion, the judicial custody of the petitioner/accused is not going to

serve any purpose whatsoever, and I am inclined to grant bail on the

following grounds, but subject to stringent conditions:

(a) In the status report the Prosecution has alleged

against the present bail petitioner Veena Devi that she is

involved in all offences except under Section 354 IPC,
and that she was the one who had smeared soot on the

face of victim as also her daugher.

(b) As per the Sections mentioned in FIR, the maximum
sentence is of ten years of imprisonment, under Section

455 of IPC, which relates to lurking house-trespass, after

preparation made for causing hurt, assault. Since no
offence prescribes sentence for twenty years or life, as

such, there would be different parameters to consider the
plea of bail.

(c) The investigation is almost at the final stages of

(d) The petitioner/accused is in judicial custody since Nov
11, 2019.

06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP

(e) The petitioner is a permanent resident of the address
mentioned in the memo of parties, as such presence can


always be secured.

(f) The petitioner has no criminal history.

5. Consequently, the present petition is allowed. The

petitioner/accused shall be released on bail in the present case, in

connection with the FIR mentioned above, on her furnishing

personal bond in the sum of `10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with

two sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial

Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Addnl. Chief Judicial Magistrate or

any Judicial Magistrate of District Mandi, HP.

6. The Court executing the personal and surety bonds shall

ascertain the identity of the bail-petitioner, her family members, and

of sureties, through AADHAR Card, Pan Card, Ration Card, etc. The

petitioner shall mention phone numbers and other details, on the

reverse page of the bonds.

7. The Counsel for the accused and the attesting official shall

explain all conditions of this bail to the petitioner.

8. This Court is granting the bail, subject to the conditions

mentioned herein. The petitioner/accused undertakes to comply with

all directions given in this order, and the furnishing of bail bonds by

the petitioner/accused is acceptance of all such conditions:

a) The petitioner undertakes to attend the trial.

06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP

b) The petitioner shall join the investigation as and when
called by the Investigating Officer. However, whenever the


investigation takes place within the boundaries of the

Police Station or the Police Post, then the accused shall
not be called before 9 AM and shall be let off before 5 PM.

c) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation.

d) The petitioner shall not hamper the investigation.

e) The petitioner undertakes not to threaten or browbeat

or use any pressure tactics on the victims, complainant,
and witnesses,

f) The petitioner shall neither influence nor try to control

the investigating officer, in any manner whatsoever.

g) The petitioner undertakes not to make any inducement
threat or promise, directly or indirectly, to the investigating
officer or any person acquainted with the facts of the case

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or
any Police Officer or tamper with the evidence.

h) In case the petitioner commits any offence prescribing
the sentence of imprisonment of more than three years,

within thirty days of knowledge of such FIR, the petitioner
shall intimate SHO of the present police station, with all the

details of the present FIR as well as the new FIR. In such
a situation, it shall be open for the State to apply to this
Court for cancellation of this bail, if it deems fit and proper.

i) Within 30 days from today, the petitioner shall sell, or
surrender, all firearms along with ammunition, and arms
licenses, if any, to the authority which had given such

06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP

j) The Petitioner shall not enter within a radius of five
kilometers of the residence of both the victims, measuring


from the shortest route, until the recording of the

statements of all witnesses, except Police officials, during
trial. In case the petitioner needs modification of this

condition, then she may apply to this Court, supported with
written permission from the victim, obtained through
Pradhan, Up Pradhan, or Ward Member of the Panchayat,

where the victim resides.

9. The present bail order is only for the FIR mentioned above. It

shall not be construed to be a blanket order of bail in all other cases,

if any, registered against the petitioner.

10. Any observation made herein above is neither an expression

of opinion on the merits of the case, nor shall the trial Court advert to

these comments.

11. The SHO/Additional SHO of the concerned Police Station or

the Investigating Officer to handover a copy of this order to the

victims and explain it to them.

Petition stands allowed in the terms mentioned above.

Copy dasti.

(Anoop Chitkara),

December 6 , 2019 (PK)

06/12/2019 20:28:25 :::HCHP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation