SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vijay Kumar & Ors vs State & Anr on 3 September, 2019

$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 03.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 1734/2019
VIJAY KUMAR ORS ….. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Amit Nahata, Advocate

versus

STATE ANR ….. Respondents
Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State
with SI Manju, PS – Rohini

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

328/2017 dated 27.07.2017 registered at Police Station – North Rohini, Delhi

for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and

consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

Notice issued.

Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2.

With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is

taken up for final disposal.

CRL.M.C. 1734/2019 Page 1 of 2

The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.12.2011, as

per Hindu rites and rituals. Two children, namely, Kashivi (5 years) and

Parth (3 years) were born out of the wedlock.

The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable

settlement and settled all their disputes amicably.

The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI Manju of Police Station – Rohini and submits that matter has

been settled and she does not wish to pursue the matter any further.

Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 328/2017 dated

27.07.2017 registered at Police Station – North Rohini, Delhi for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

The petition is allowed accordingly.

Order dasti.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 03, 2019
PB

CRL.M.C. 1734/2019 Page 2 of 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation