SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Vikash Painuly vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 July, 2021

Try out our Premium Member services: Virtual Legal Assistant, Query Alert Service and an ad-free experience. Free for one month and pay only if you like it.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14643/2020

Vikash Painuly S/o Indamani Painuly, Aged About 31 Years,
Dwara Hariprasad Bahuguna, Kanhiya Vihar, Kargi Chauk,
Dehradun (Uttarekhand).

—-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

—-Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuj Sahlot
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shiv Kumar Bhati, PP
Mr. Abhishek Mehta

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Order

05/07/2021
The bail application has been filed under
Section 438 CrPC.

in connection with FIR No.26/2020 registered at Police Station

Mahila Thana, Jodhpur City West for the offences under Sections

498A, 406, 323 354 IPC whereupon the investigation was

commenced. Apprehending this arrest, the petitioner moved the

bail application before the court below, which was dismissed.

Hence, the present bail application has been filed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and perused the entire material available on

record.

Learned counsel submits that the entire dowry has been

handed over back and he has also presented himself for

interrogation and charge sheet has already been prepared.

(Downloaded on 06/07/2021 at 08:34:30 PM)

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-14643/2020]

Without commenting further on merits and taking into

consideration the nature of allegations and aforesaid facts, this

bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC is allowed and it is

directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner-Vikash Painuly

S/o Indamani Painuly in the aforesaid FIR, he shall be released

on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided he

furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two

sureties of the like amount to his satisfaction on the following

conditions:

i) That the petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation by a police officer, as and when

required;

ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly

make any inducement, threat or promise to any

person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the

court or to any police officer;

iii) That the petitioner shall not leave India without

previous permission of the court;

iv) That the petitioner shall not commit any offence

similar to the offence of which he is accused or

suspected.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

Nitin/52

(Downloaded on 06/07/2021 at 08:34:30 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation